this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024

175 points (96.8% liked)

News

36480 readers

2760 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

175

Exclusive: The inside story of John Roberts and Trump’s immunity win at the Supreme Court | CNN Politics (www.cnn.com)

submitted 2 years ago by UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Roberts made no serious effort to entice the three liberal justices for even a modicum of the cross-ideological agreement that distinguished such presidential-powers cases in the past. He believed he could persuade people to look beyond Trump.

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 54 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The thing that is most amazing about the immunity ruling is that it a) hands the executive a giant mallet with which to smash whatever it wants (as long as it's called 'official' aka 'national security') but for the few times that it may get challenged, reserves the right to decide whether it was official or not to the same gang that handed over the mallet.

That gives them the right to declare anything they don't like by a president they don't favor as 'non-official' and whatever a president they like does as 'cool.' And good luck challenging something when you can't even take a look at the 'evidence.'

It's an elaborate construct designed to divert water in exactly one direction and not another, at least for the lifetime of this Chief Justice.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 19 points 2 years ago

Chevron Deference says hi as well.

The fucking scumbags at the heritage foundation and federalist society got their government. They gave us this supreme court and now it will be the only branch that matters.

They've gerrymandered the fuck out of the country that Congress is perpetually useless, they've increased the power of the judiciary, and they've left the executive branch to have power that they deem acceptable depending on who is at the helm at the time.

[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

This is the Roberts court’s legacy, the most politicized court in modern history, and the lack of all accountability or impartiality; politics is first and foremost. I’m not at all surprised, but it’s good to see this in writing.

[–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Don't forget blatant corruption and a refusal to be held to any reasonable code of ethics!

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

The only thing I can think of is that Roberts and Co must think the rest of us are morons. His rationale seemed to be that he wanted to make sure the ruling applied to all presidents and not just Trump, but seemed to forget that Trump is known for pushing our system past the previously established political norms.

You can't say "Presidents need immunity so George W. doesn't get prosecuted for torturing terrorists at CIA black sites" without also realizing that you're giving Trump immunity for stealing classified documents and trying to overthrow our government.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

CNN Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

CNN is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Ok, this "mostly factual," tells me absolutely nothing. What part is not factual? If the bot won't point out the lies then it's just a program version of captain obvious. 🙄

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't want to block the bot. I want the bot to actually be useful.

You don't stop wiping your butt if the toilet paper is thin, you fold it over and do what you can.

This bot is the equivalent of two ply tp. Yes it does the job but not well and everyone feels a little less clean afterwards.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It also calls CNN left center. 😂

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What would you classify it as?

[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Center right to Americans, rightwing on the world stage.