this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
457 points (99.4% liked)

News

36270 readers
2760 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • The Federal Trade Commission on Friday sued three large U.S. health companies that negotiate insulin prices, arguing the drug middlemen boost their profits while "artificially" inflating costs for patients. 
  • The suit targets the three biggest so-called pharmacy benefit managers, UnitedHealth Group's Optum Rx, CVS Health's Caremark and Cigna's Express Scripts, and their affiliated group purchasing organizations.
  • The FTC may also recommend suing insulin manufacturers Eli Lilly, Sanofi and Novo Nordisk in the future.
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Kahn is the real deal. I hope Harris keeps her and gives her anything she asks for.

Lina Kahn could be the trust buster we need to get America's shit together and maybe reign in some of these big businesses that seem to be completely above the law.

[–] serendepity@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Kahn is the real deal.

It’s Khan

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago
[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm okay with a little confusion there

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 25 points 1 year ago

We also need to stop Republicans from constantly trying (and sometimes succeeding) to strip the FTC of its powers to enforce issues/laws/regulations well within its scope as a federal agency.

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Whatever her budget is, double it.

And send here a case of whatever she’s drinking

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

pharmabros be like

khaaaan

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

This is why I vote blue no matter who, right here.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, Please. These fuckers are the devil. Sue them into oblivion. Rip the dollars out of their bloody hands.

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Independent pharmacist here

We've lost over 9 pharmacies a day in 2024 because of these guys who do everything they can to steer you to their mail order pharmacies.

They're absolutely killing us and killing access. Please, do not use mail order.

[–] shikitohno@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I have an option not to, I don't. Unfortunately, the way health insurance works here, I often don't have an option. With the insurance I had through my previous job, basically as soon as I requested a second refill, the pharmacy benefits would go "Hey, we won't cover this anymore, unless you switch to 90-day refills via CVS Caremark." At some points last year, that could easily have been $500-$1,000/month more for me to pay for my meds in order to keep getting them at the pharmacy two blocks away, and I just didn't have it. Instead of going there and having pretty much all my prescriptions filled in an hour or less, I got to enjoy Caremark not letting me refill until the last minute, then encountering shipping delays with medications I really shouldn't have been abruptly missing doses of.

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Totally hear you and that's what we got to legislate against. Thank you for telling another tale of their abuse.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I work for one of the parent companies of one of them and damn the propaganda has been crazy trying to discredit everything about the reports and the cases against them and trying to get employees to write to politicians and propagandize for them. They must be actually worried about the hit to profits over this. I mean it's not like any tiny little fine will be a concern.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Time to make a million lina khan clones and put them in government.

[–] banshee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago