this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

54576 readers
1170 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This is the benefit of using distributed tools like git.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

https://feddit.org/post/9959466/5697405

[why blocked?] "a contributor made a push from a sanctioned region is what i saw. not even a main dev, and they didn’t receive any warning is my understanding. i might be way off, i’m not a final source:

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Not that I condone Microsoft, but if it is a sanctioned country (Russia, Iran, North Korea, etc.). Microsoft will be in shit with the US government if they let it there.

If the project has contributors from there, then I guess they need to move off GitHub like they did.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So now we know how to instantly delist any project on GitHub.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Step 1: Get write access to the project you dislike.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Seems like a vulnerability to exploit

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

This is a really strong argument for not depending on non-federated, centrally controlled services. It doesn't matter which country or company is behind Your Favorite Service™, they can be legally mandated to by Oppressive Regime ("it could never happen in my country!"), or they could just be arbitrary assholes.

I don't care why Microsoft did it. I moved off Github when MS acquired them, although in this case it probably wouldn't have made a difference. Regardless, what it proves is that you can not rely on a monopoly.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Ooh, I didn't know that someone had developed a mechanism to move issues and PRs.

I remember commenting on the fact that while it's easy to move the source repo itself from location to location, as git makes that easy and self-contained, issues and PRs didn't enjoy that.

[–] inbeesee@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Forgejo seems pretty good, I'll move my stuff there too