this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
112 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

2519 readers
210 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Police and federal agencies have found a controversial new way to skirt the growing patchwork of laws that curb how they use facial recognition: an AI model that can track people using attributes like body size, gender, hair color and style, clothing, and accessories.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gait tracking isn't new. But doing this goes against the spirit of the antifacialrecog laws. Unless lawmakers enforce that part of the interpretation, then they're allowing a very dangerous precedent (which, I'm assuming, they know and intend).

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And we all know law enforcement doesn't like to subvert the spirit of laws.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nor the actual letter of the law

Yeah they do that, but i dont think it gets them quite as hard.

[–] Zoma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Cant wait to buy the tor clothing bundle to reduce my fingerprint. Might be a good time to invest in a Burqa.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How is this new? I thought gait (walking style) analysis already covered identifying people without a clear face, and that there were already automated tools for it.

This just seems like a tool to use as an excuse to nab the wrong person because they looked or dressed similar.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably more about what they're turning to rather than it being new. The main issue is that all of these tools are very hit or miss (facial is probably the best, but also really just a "close enough" given most camera angles/quality being used are meh).

But the inaccuracy is a feature, not a bug. It means you can trigger certain standards whenever you want.

[–] IAmLamp@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago

Enrollment at the Ministry of Silly Walks has been increasing, and now you know why.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Time to invest in khaki chinos and whatever shirts the Nazis are wearing.

[–] skarn@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Semi-serious question but totally OT.

I actually like (among others) khaki chinos, and where I live they have no right-wing association that I know of.

Should I avoid them when I come to the US on business from time to time? Is there a chance I will be mistaken for a nazi?

What else should I avoid?

[–] tapdattl@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

You'll be fine, it's like when people get worried about wearing red or blue or other "gang colors", context matters. The -- in your case pants -- that you're wearing needs to be combined with a bunch of other markers to signal yourself as a Nazi

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] skarn@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

Yikes, mine are not cargos but... I'll leave my khakis on this side of the Atlantic.