"After paying a broker $50,000 over MSRP to be one of the first people to own a Cybertruck"
I mean, come on lmao
this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
485 points (92.0% liked)
Cyberstuck
901 readers
15 users here now
A place to post your Cybertruck fails! We're here to make fun of this hunk of shit and throw as much shade as we can to that garbage bag of a human elon.
No doxxing No slurs No racism And no fucking nazis!
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
It is likely a fake story.
- The E-Scooter would have needed to hit that Cybertruck at like MACH 3 to do enough damage to warrant a total loss.
- He can refuse the total loss and demand they do repairs ... yes, that is an option.
- The article is adding a $50k delivery fee to the value of the vehicle. This guy allegedly agreed to pay and finance Fifty Thousand Dollars to have a car delivered ... everyone involved in doing this could be considered stupid.
- There is no way this guy is stupid enough to not have Gap coverage (unless he is MAGA, then I take it back).
In a case like this the guy would have insurance over a barrel. He could turn down the total loss and demand repairs for so many reasons; The total loss is financially ruinous He could claim an emotional impact is involved in losing the vehicle and it needs repaired.
If this story is true, no one is dumb enough (except MAGA) to just accept the total loss payout and not sue the insurance company.
MAGA is 70+mil people in the US and intelligence is less of a steep climb after that and more of painful, barely perceptible slope toward eventual mediocrity. As for the E-Scooter, you’d be amazed how easy it is to damage a Cybertruck, and remember that total losses are connected more to repair costs than anything and these heaps of garbage can be very expensive to repair properly. Whether or not the guy challenges them on it I do not doubt that they easily could have declared it a total loss.
I feel like, at this point, if you say “no one could be that dumb” then you are using yourself to prove that they absolutely could be. It could even be fake in the end but you’re not right if you stumbled upon the correct answer using deeply flawed logic and got lucky.
No, I "stumbled" onto the answer because I have 4 years of total loss specialty appraisal experience and know exactly what I'm talking about.
And yet, if you look at my comment, I was specifically talking about how the last decade has been marked by people saying “no one could be that dumb” and then watching them all be that dumb and here you are, repeating history. So, job specific experience not required.
And aside from that I know people with decades of career experience who are dumber than rocks and barely squeak by simply because our society is a farce. I’ll say that’s probably not you, but it’s far from impossible.
Plus I just don't see how a bank would be willing to finance the $50k broker fee. Cars can end up underwater from depreciation, but I've never heard of a bank willingly lending more than the purchase price of a new car, to where it's underwater at the transaction.
Tesla did the financing for a lot of those, and they did finance the crazy delivery fees.
Dumb and wasteful
Ok ... Help me out here ... Is this an onion article? My only hint is the e-scooter but given the complete god awful design of that truck I can't even tell anymore.
TL;DR: man does not understand how Insurance works; that vehicles are depreciating assets.
What kind of fucking idiot does not understand that a vehicle is a depreciating asset!?
Yeah, the minute you buy a vehicle for $200,000 and you drive it off the lot, it is now worth $135,000.
Furthermore, insurance does not give you back "what you paid" you get "replacement value". So if you were stupid enough to pay $200,000 and it's depreciated to $70,000, that's what you get, because that's what it cost to replace your stupid toy.
Why is this even an article
Why is this even an article
Because it's designed to make us feel good at the cost of a fool's misfortune.
Just like 50% of the "news" out there.
This is like ragebait mixed with an ad for gap insurance
But it's schadenfreude nonetheless
It was never even worth $200k they paid an extra $50k to get it earlier.
Because the level of depreciation of the Cybertruck is unusally high compared to other cars.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Give the E-Scooter rider a medal. Four more and the person is an Ace.
200k to blow on a car but doesn't have 30 bucks a month for gap insurance
Came here to say super similar.
Also, since when is gap insurance $30 per month? I want to say I paid a flat $300 for it on my last car (back in 2020, just before the pandemic) for the life of the loan (6 years / 72 months)
load more comments
(3 replies)
On the face of it, this might seem like a grave injustice committed by the insurance company; however, sadly, looking at the current Cybertruck secondary market, $77,000 is about the fair market value for a similarly spec’d Cybertruck.
I don't see what the problem is then? Like you take the 77k, buy an identical used truck and are back at where you were before the accident which is the whole point of insurance...
I read the article hoping to find out how being sideswiped by an e-scooter could total a truck, but I was left unsatisfied.
Remember that a "totaled" vehicle doesn't mean it can't be used, or even that it is heavily damaged just that insurance has decided that the specific repairs needed would cost more than just paying out the current value.
They don't care if you get your vehicle fixed or replaced, insurance only cares about paying as little as possible using every loophole as possible.
Yeah, I've been on the other side of that, but sideswiped by a scooter? I get that they aren't worth as much as they were, but still...
Cybertrucks are really, really bad for repairability. Consider the fact that on a normal car you can fix a dent by getting the panel most of the way back to the correct shape and then fairing it the rest of the way with Bondo before painting it. But with a Cybertruck, you'd have to metalwork the panel all the way back to perfect and then somehow figure out how to match the surface finish. It's a lot more labor, if it's even possible.
It could be that the insurance doubts that the vehicle can be completely restored to its pre-loss condition at any price.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
It was a made up story posted to reddit. The original reddit post was deleted but people mentioned the pictures were taken directly from this story of a Cybertruck being hit by a Toyota: https://www.electrifiedmag.com/news/tesla-cybertruck-holiday-hiccup-first-reported-accident/
A truck would be fine, but this fragile piece of shit just fell apart.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
What’s the problem? He got $77k because that’s what’ll cost him to buy a used Cybertruck, which will put him back to where he was before the accident. The financial loss he’s taken already happened way before the accident.
I don't know who is the biggest moron here the idiot buying a cybertruck or the idiotic banker approving a 200k loan for a cybertruck.
Either way... LMFAO 🤣
Imagine being destroyed by a fucking scooter lol
So I saw something about this.
Apparently the Cybertruck is way more unibody than most cars, their "gigamold" technology or whatever where the truck is made out of a small number of unusually large parts means a bolt-on bolt-off repair on most cars is "the entire cab is bent, it's done" on the DePlorean.
I love how Musk will just put "giga" in front of things to make it sound cool. It's sooooo silly and ridiculous, like something a 7 year old would do, or a comic book supervillain.
"Sir we've finished the road to -"
"The gigaroad."
"Er, yes, we finished the gigaroad to the facto-"
"Gigafactory"
"..."
"😎"
load more comments
(5 replies)
imagine spending 200k on a cybertruck and getting totaled by an escooter this guy is a fucking moron
Oh noes! You're having difficulty filing an insurance claim for your Swasticar? Woe unto you, the stars weep for your tragedy.
This is why you also need gap insurance for anything but the cheapest cars. It exists to prevent this situation.
Or you just don't spend 200K on a cybertruck if you don't have that kind of money. What is a cybertruck going to do for you that a 10K second hand truck can't? Even if your second hand 10K truck burns down after a year, you can still buy a new one every year for 20 years for 200K.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Probably hard to find any recycled parts because there are so few of them on the road, and buying a new part is probably expensive and timely. I'm sure Telsa isn't allowing any LKQ production either. And even if you get a part, you have to go to a shop that can work on the car, which will be expensive because who's going to want to work on a vehicle that rusts when you look at it? Even if it seems fine, once someone is in an accident, every single thing that happens next will be the accident. Rear ended six months ago? Yup, that's why your tire blew, not the nail in it. So that person will keep coming back. The new piece is rusted, the new piece isn't as straight, the new piece buckled. An insurance company will absolutely total a car not just because the repairs are over the costs, but if it seems like it's always going to have issues, they'll make a decision to total it as the cheaper option. They do that with rodent issues all the time. And during all this, depending on his coverage, he's racking up rental. And rental always runs out.
He's complaining about standard insurance practices. They don't owe you the overpriced amount the dealership talked you into, they owe ACV/Actual Cash Value. The moment you leave the lot, it's losing money. It doesn't matter how great you took care of it, or if it's like new. You don't get the brand new, off the lot price, for a vehicle that's no longer brand new, off the lot.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Buying a 198k car on credit, smh.
Breaks out world's tiniest violin...
This piece of shit costs $200k???
No, he paid $200,000 for that piece of shit. Right now a new one should be about $70k, which is still $70k for a turd floating in a punch bowl, but is also $130,000 less than what he paid.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That is the reason GAP insurance coverage exists. Deciding to skimp out on your insurance coverage when buying an expensive vehicle is stupid. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
load more comments
(9 replies)
Google started recommending this site to me recently, and it's garbage. It's all unverified social media posts told in the first person. Shit is WILD.
load more comments
(1 replies)
$198K of stupid banker. $198K of stupid wanker.
I just hope my savings aren't in a bank that "invests" like that.
Hard to imagine getting sideswiped by an e-scooter would disable a vehicle that size. Presumably it's still drivable. I would think he'd be better off paying for any truly necessary repairs himself and driving it as-is. But somebody who would pay that much for any car or pickup probably isn't the type to drive anything that doesn't look showroom fresh.
I paid a broker in California to find one and ship it to me. Their fees were $50k plus fees/taxes (totally reasonable seeing how limited they were.)
Allstate isn't covering that and is hitting me with depreciation. Can I fight this?
What a dumbass. Hell no your insurance isn't going to cover the amount you paid somebody to go and find one of these for you, and no, $50K for that service is not reasonable lmao
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›