this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
122 points (96.2% liked)

World News

46819 readers
3256 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The change is designed to halt the use of kirakira (shiny or glittery) names that have proliferated among parents hoping to add a creative flourish

Parents in Japan will no longer have free rein over the names they give their children, after the introduction this week of new rules on the pronunciation of kanji characters.

The change is designed to halt the use of kirakira (shiny or glittery) names that have proliferated among parents hoping to add a creative flourish to their children’s names – creating administrative headaches for local authorities and, in some cases, inviting derision from classmates.

While the revisions to the family registry act do not ban kanji – Chinese-based characters in written Japanese – parents are required to inform local authorities of their phonetic reading, in an attempt to banish unusual or controversial pronunciations.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 63 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All three babies born in Japan this year will breath a sigh of relief I'm sure.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

This year: three babies

Next year: 3 million kevinist kids shackled with absolutely dumb vanity names until they are permitted to change them.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Names that seem excessively “creative” can seem stupid to me, but government regulation is the worst way possible to try and deal with it. As usual, tolerance is the answer.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

What do you mean?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 2 days ago

Pikachu, Naiki (Nike), Daiya (Diamond), Pū (as in Winnie-the-Pooh) and Kitty

Is that the worst they can come up with? They could learn a lot from Americans.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

While the revisions to the family registry act do not ban kanji – Chinese-based characters in written Japanese – parents are required to inform local authorities of their phonetic reading

Well this is fucking crazy to me. Almost every single form you ever have to write your name on in Japan also has a section that you have to write the phonetic reading of it as well. The fact that it doesn't exist on the family register is absolutely bonkers. I know Japan hates updating things, but even back in the day there were multiple readings for the same kanji characters, and the government being ok with ambiguity on official documents is blowing my mind.

Even before the shiny names the article is talking about the names could be wildly different. We're not talking about not knowing if Ashleigh is pronounced Ash-lee or Ash-lay, it's like 里香 being commonly read as either Rika or Satoko.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee -1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

As an aside, Ashleigh is an abomination regardless of how it's spelled, derived from a toponymic surname that later became a boy's given name. Parents who give their daughters such names should be put in the stocks and made to eat gruel made from spelt cooked in day-old hotdog water.

[–] nun@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

Bro how bad did Ashleigh hurt you?

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

What if my daughter is actually a field with ash trees though?

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago
[–] OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Little Bobby Tables nods approvingly.

(an old XKCD joke)

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

Someone in California had a vanity plate that read "NULL." Turns out that's where the state computer assigned traffic tickets where the license plate was unreadable, so he got a shedload, and it took him a lot of work to get that mess cleared up.

Null is also a German surname, so people who aren't taking the piss get caught in problems due to stupid input validation and bad testing.

[–] ksigley@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

There really is an xkcd for everything.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That really seems like a tool a government could use to abuse minority populations. Not to mention stagnate it's culture.

[–] ksigley@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago
[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

How many children unfortunate enough to have Elon Musk as their sperm donor have outlandish names/

[–] Lembot_0002@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)
  1. Name_1_male
  2. Name_1_female

...

  1. Name_16_male
  2. Name_16_female

Should be enough!

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Following the logic of one of my beloved enterprise data architect everything should use UUIDs as way of refer to an entity… so more like

  • a6a01005-b698-4344-a88b-06911ca71965
  • 5f763196-46a6-4f1d-b7b8-55d948eb6080

Wouldn’t be practical to pronounce but otherwise no more problem of gimmicky names :)

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

I prefer my unique IDs to be derived from the whole UTF-16 table.

[–] Crampon@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

Not allowed.

Name_1_Body-type_A Name_2_Body-type_B