this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
449 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

9932 readers
1970 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sus@programming.dev 77 points 2 years ago (4 children)
[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 2 years ago

See, that's an actual thought provoking piece on the nature of human perception so you can argue it's an actual work of art.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’ve commented about this before, but I do actually miss those first few generations of image generators. The first DeepDream style stuff was interesting but didn’t go very far, but this image in particular is a milestone for what came directly after.

I would love to run VQGAN+CLIP locally, for example, in some efficient way. It was fun to play with and to see how the model interpreted the input. And it wasn’t as scary as the tools we have now (especially when those are paired with the deep fake face swap stuff, for example)

I genuinely think slop is the perfect word for the current iteration of these image generators, both the image outputs themselves and the role they’re playing in the already-bleak digital media landscape.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 2 years ago

This is the first time I realize that this famous image was not "designed" to simulate what a stroke feels like visually, it was just serendipity. They were probably just really trying to generate an image of a living room, but the AI image generators were still in its infancy.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shlitzburg. That wasn't hard.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

This is only the first round.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 66 points 2 years ago (2 children)

https://simonwillison.net/2024/May/8/slop/

Watching in real time as “slop” becomes a term of art. the way that “spam” became the term for unwanted emails, “slop” is going in the dictionary as the term for unwanted AI generated content

TIL

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago (5 children)

But there is no "spam-core" aesthetic

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sure there is, it's the weirdos who print out emails (or print literally everything).

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

This is most likely an error in space-time.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I beg to differ

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5c6c6a87-a5b9-4005-9d5c-bf9ed7cf25ef.jpeg

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Well, there is James Veitch and similar comedians turning spam into part of their art.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago

extended warranties have become a meme, and probably are an aesthetic

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wasnt "slop" used before AI to describe something bad and masse produced on the internet?

Not even the internet specifically, but often media in general. It comes from the use of "slop" as the mix of garbage that you pour into a feeding trough for pigs. Basically junk that companies think people will gobble up regardless of the quality.

[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I will mock AI "art" until my dying breath.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

As we all should.

[–] Barzaria@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Right next to AI hieroglyphs aesthetic

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What is slop? All I'm getting from a lazy google is references to animal feed and liquids.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

just a general word for mediocre images that are taking up space over better stuff. Like AI images being the first result for 'frog' or something would be considered AI slop

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

Thanks!

Me being drunk and Jerboa not allowing me to keep the op and my question in sight while responding limit my ability to ask my next question. I have deleted and tried typing that question too many times.

Thanks anyway.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I thought slop was what you feed pigs.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

It is! According to search engines I typed "Slop" into. Amazing that slop makes bacon. I love slop.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Bit of a harsh word to call people who unironically like AI art

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Interview: Why did you give them 7 fingers on one hand and 4.5 fingers on the other?

Artist: It's Slopcore, you wouldn't understand.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

One of my favorite obsolete usages is slop for a jacket or outerwear, derived from middle English but kept alive in the nautical vernacular for some time after.

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I hate this because I know it is true

[–] s_s@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

If you've not seen the new Dandy Warhol's video it's incredible.