this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
1266 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

14653 readers
3080 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 43 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

This is surely trivial to detect. If the number of pages on the site is greater than some insanely high number then just drop all data from that site from the training data.

It's not like I can afford to compete with OpenAI on bandwidth, and they're burning through money with no cares already.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 22 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah sure, but when do you stop gathering regularly constructed data, when your goal is to grab as much as possible?

Markov chains are an amazingly simple way to generate data like this, and a little bit of stacked logic it's going to be indistinguishable from real large data sets.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

You can compress multiple TB of nothing with the occasional meme down to a few MB.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Vari@lemm.ee 63 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I’m so happy to see that ai poison is a thing

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 132 points 19 hours ago (10 children)

It's so sad we're burning coal and oil to generate heat and electricity for dumb shit like this.

[–] rdri@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Wait till you realize this project's purpose IS to force AI to waste even more resources.

[–] kuhli@lemm.ee 75 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I mean, the long term goal would be to discourage ai companies from engaging in this behavior by making it useless

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 hours ago

That's war. That has been the nature of war and deterrence policy ever since industrial manufacture has escalated both the scale of deployments and the cost and destructive power of weaponry. Make it too expensive for the other side to continue fighting (or, in the case of deterrence, to even attack in the first place). If the payoff for scraping no longer justifies the investment of power and processing time, maybe the smaller ones will give up and leave you in peace.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 176 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

Deployment of Nepenthes and also Anubis (both described as "the nuclear option") are not hate. It's self-defense against pure selfish evil, projects are being sucked dry and some like ScummVM could only freakin' survive thanks to these tools.

Those AI companies and data scrapers/broker companies shall perish, and whoever wrote this headline at arstechnica shall step on Lego each morning for the next 6 months.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 44 points 20 hours ago

Feels good to be on an instance with Anubis

one of the united Nations websites deployed Anubis

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have a link to a story of what happened to ScummVM? I love that project and I’d be really upset if it was lost!

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 19 hours ago (3 children)
[–] PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works 6 points 15 hours ago

Thanks, interesting and brief read!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 374 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Funny that they’re calling them AI haters when they’re specifically poisoning AI that ignores the do not enter sign. FAFO.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 38 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

First Albatross, First Out

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] passepartout@feddit.org 235 points 22 hours ago

AI is the "most aggressive" example of "technologies that are not done 'for us' but 'to us.'"

Well said.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 34 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"Markov Babble" would make a great band name

[–] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 13 points 14 hours ago

Their best album was Infinite Maze.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

Cool, but as with most of the anti-AI tricks its completely trivial to work around. So you might stop them for a week or two, but they'll add like 3 lines of code to detect this and it'll become useless.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 41 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

Could you imagine a world where word of mouth became the norm again? Your friends would tell you about websites, and those sites would never show on search results because crawlers get stuck.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 7 points 13 hours ago

That would be terrible, I have friends but they mostly send uninteresting stuff.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No they wouldn't. I'm guessing you're not old enough to remember a time before search engines. The public web dies without crawling. Corporations will own it all you'll never hear about anything other than amazon or Walmart dot com again.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 25 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Nope. That isn't how it worked. You joined message boards that had lists of web links. There were still search engines, but they were pretty localized. Google was also amazing when their slogan was "don't be evil" and they meant it.

[–] zanyllama52@infosec.pub 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I was there. People carried physical notepads with URLs, shared them on BBS', or other forums. It was wild.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There was also "circle banners" of websites that would link to each others... And then off course "stumble upon"...

[–] zanyllama52@infosec.pub 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 5 points 14 hours ago

I forgot web rings! Also the crazy all centered Geocities websites people made. The internet was an amazing place before the major corporations figured it out.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 74 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 92 points 23 hours ago (8 children)

This might explain why newer AI models are going nuts. Good jorb 👍

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago

It absolutely doesn’t. The only model that has “gone nuts” is Grok, and that’s because of malicious code pushed specifically for the purpose of spreading propaganda.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 69 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Nice ..... I look forward to the next generation of AI counter counter measures that will make the internet an even more unbearable mess in order to funnel as much money and control to a small set of idiots that think they can become masters of the universe and own every single penny on the planet.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 40 points 22 hours ago (28 children)

All the while as we roast to death because all of this will take more resources than the entire energy output of a medium sized country.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mspencer712@programming.dev 31 points 20 hours ago

Wait… I just had an idea.

Make a tarpit out of subtly-reprocessed copies of classified material from Wikileaks. (And don’t host it in the US.)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›