this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
152 points (93.7% liked)

Obviously

59 readers
247 users here now

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

We tried. And we lost.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

My wife voted for Hillary over Bernie in the 2016 primaries because she was a woman. No other reason. I was furious.

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 56 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The leaders of the DNC chose wrong, America was not given the option.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 10 points 21 hours ago

They should have given him the chance to compete to the end in 2016 rather than forcing him to step down. But they would rather watch America's standing as a democratic republic crumble than see an administration where corporations make any less money.

[–] ProfHillbilly@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

There is the answer I was looking for.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago
[–] lewdian69@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Found this browsing All and was about to post the word that is the community's name. How fitting.

[–] Yermaw@lemm.ee 5 points 22 hours ago

Me too, I think that's how they get ya

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

but that means homeless people and the poor would have had better access to healthcare, housing, education, food, and a laundry list of other EVIL SOCIALIST PROGRAMS!!!

think of the SHARE HOLDERS, YOU MONSTERS!!!

/s

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 5 points 21 hours ago

Not opinion. Fact.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago

There is simply no way the powers that be would've allowed it. They allow him his "platform" because it effectively rounds people they might deem "interesting" up so they can better surveil them. If there was ever a real chance of him getting closer to power he would've been JFK'd immediately. I'm still not convinced that isn't the plan for AOC, but ofc I hope I'm wrong.