I think it's also a sign that people want devices that don't come from Big Data, aren't online and aren't designed to put them under surveillance and invade their privacy.
this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
70 points (93.8% liked)
Technology
4891 readers
453 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Seriously how do you see the resurgence of the first, least feature rich smart watch and go write an article about people wanting "something unique". Do they think what I'm really missing is a watch face with a quirky octopus?
Exactly.
People don't root for feature-poor stuff because it's unique but because the features it's missing - that they want - preclude the hardware and the hardware maker from slipping in features that they don't want.
the only tatches that stuck with me were the original pebble, pebble time steel, and a pinetime. I also have a galaxy watch gathering dust in a drawer somewhere, which is just not practical
Yes, this.
I don't want to be a product of by watch/phone.
Yep. I can't wait to get mine and be in complete control of my data. No cloud bullshit.
Until we get actual sales figures, it's a little early to tell if people crave the Pebble. I do want one, but it's mostly because I saw the potential for app development and imagined the amazing things people would write for it. Definitely not because it's unique.
I loved my pebble, genuinely the perfect "smart" watch.
just enough tech to make it extra useful, week long battery life with always on screen (eink).
extra features they I absolutely loved. smart alarm, it tracked sleep quality to wake you somewhere between your alarm time and 30 minutes before to wake you up at the best sleep cycle, it was amazing, best alarm clock ever, it didn't wake up my wife, only me. you cannot do it with modern smart watches because they need to charge.
no touchscreen, PHYSICAL TACTILE BUTTONS!!!! I could use so many features without even looking at it? mute, contol music, dismiss stuff... genuinely useful stuff that actually made me use my phone less.
And its personality? it was cheerful and loveable.
how is the return of a ~~failed~~ product "unique"?
ps: I've been informed they were discontinued to be eliminated as competition so I should not assume their exit from market was due to commecial failure
Failed?
successful products do not exit the market
They were bought by Fitbit.
yes, and discontinued right after, no?
look don't get me wrong, I like the product and curious about its return. I just find it strange to pretend a version 2 of a product is "unique"
That is Apple level of "we inveted this thing that has been in the market for 2 years"
They were bought bc they where competitive budget smartwatches that gave their userbase freedom. Fitbit bought them just to emilimate them as competition. Further more the fact that theres still a pebble community all these years later still using and loving an old smartwatch proves not only where they succesful but fitbit was not. Fitbit is gone, and pebble rises again from their ashes like a pheonix
Alright TIL, thanks for the informational reply
they were bought out by competition, why make better products of you can simply buy off competitors.
Pebble was competing with Fitbit so Fitbit bought them, then Google bought Fitbit because they were competing in the smart watch market.
as pointed in the ps on my orginal comment, I just found out about that and removed the "failed" adjective from my question