this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
196 points (98.5% liked)

politics

23250 readers
3059 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Let's see how that 'Just In Time' supply chain works out, shall we?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Whoa whoa whoa, on demand manufacturing allows us to be agile and utilize LEAN manufacturing to provide maximum value to our shareholders by cutting wages, cutting positions and not investing in a single fuckin lick of infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Hold on the scrum master is saying something but these doritos are loud! It's a big bag. Engincruncherring something something crunch clean crunch desk crunch your pink crunch sps. Crunch crunch belongings crunch crunch. I think he wants us to get everything to be pink!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You'd think the world would have learned that lesson during and after COVID lockdowns.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just in time supply chains are too cost effective for alternatives methods to compete.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They're cost effective as long as nothing goes wrong. Remember the knock-on effects of one ship blocking the Suez Canal?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Such events are so uncommon they aren't going to change the supply chain for them.

This particular event isn't solved by supply chain management. The goods aren't coming because the tariffs and uncertainty are too high and distribution contracts don't change that quickly.

There were many articles a few weeks back about how American companies were canceling orders.

For the first round of tariffs, they squeezed the Chinese manufacturers but after the tariffs continued to rise those manufacturers had to say no more and the American companies had no choice but to cancel orders.

There is absolutely no surprise in shipments dropping because we've know for weeks that orders have been cancelled.

Places like Walmart have a contract that the distributor must sell goods to them below a certain price point and no one can hit that price so the goods aren't ordered and nothing is shipped.

Walmart's contracts is the reason shelves will go empty but don't expect Walmart to take the blame when everyone is primed to blame Trump.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Oh, I dunno. I reckon we do with a break from rampant materialism. Learn to grow food.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Trump Slump?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

You should really file it. Could sell stuff with it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

The Donald Slump. Making Recession Great again

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

Coming to an empty shelf near you!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Even the article is demand slumped.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If there’s a lack of demand, that should drive prices down. Probably not enough to cover tariffs.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Prices can't go below the cost of production and transport.

A lot of goods are on quite small margins. When the tariffs are bigger than the margin the product becomes uneconomic to ship to the US. This is what you're seeing. There's less demand for shipping because companies have halted shipments to the US.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Unless they can no longer afford to warehouse them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Warehouse what? They simply stop production. The shipping containers are a lagging indicator. The production stopped when the orders evaporated.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

US isn't the only market. Likely to see price drops in Europe when supply will outstrip demand, but still maintain a better margin that the US.

At least until production rates adjust.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

Other way round the limited market and loss of profit will result in a temporary drop in price and a subsequent steep increase in price or decrease in quality to make up for the loss of profit that happens when the American market shuts down or slows.