this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
150 points (98.7% liked)

News

36201 readers
2661 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk's social media platform X sued Minnesota on Wednesday over a state law that bans people from using AI-generated "deepfakes" to influence an election, which the company said violated protections of free speech.

The law replaces social media platforms' judgment about the content with the judgment of the state and threatens criminal liability if the platforms get it wrong, according to the lawsuit that was filed in Minnesota federal court.

"This system will inevitably result in the censorship of wide swaths of valuable political speech and commentary," X said in its complaint. Musk has described himself as a free speech absolutist and he did away with Twitter's content moderation policy when he bought the company in 2022 and renamed it X.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Deep fake Musk saying that he retracts and drops the suing case, and play it in court.

But make it obviously fake, maybe include his children in it showing love and affection towards him, or something equally far fetched, like him beating a tutorial boss

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago

like him beating a tutorial boss

Lmao.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Have him show empathy. That will prove it's fake.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But if they make it as real as possible, that would be a giga-chad legal move. (But illegal under the law that is being challanged)

If they can convince to anyone in the court room that the video is real evidence, then it proves their point. It would put Felon in a tough logical situation. He can continue his challange and the state will point to the deepfake of himself giving contradictory statements, or he can drop it and the state's lawyers then did a crime, and they open them selves up to another lawsuit.

Its a bold move cotton, lets see if it plays out.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

If it is only used in court it isn't influencing an election. So they'd still be in the clear.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I made this but idk how to share it bc catbox.moe never works for me, imgur is down, and I don't have a peertube account

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you telling him to just Xit it out?

And what does he do once this message has been Xat?

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

He can Xit it all over Xitter and they will b& the poster, having Xat all over their supposed free speech commitment which we all know is Xit.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ah, yes, X. The platform that reduces your visibility if you criticize Musk.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hello, i am a deranged oblong. Can I procreate with you? I know video games and rockets?

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 5 points 10 months ago

I know video games and rockets

(x) Doubt

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Somebody should deepfake Musk a few times. the nastiest, disgusting-est deepfakes.

normally I'd say it shouldn't happen to anyone, but if Musk is really going to open that can of worms, he should know what it feels like. (hey, there's one right there. A deepfake of musk lounging in a can of worms.)

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No you're thinking too small. You use the billions of images and hours of video of Musk and Trump and use that to deep fake a very long and passionate gay sex tape scene. Fuck, you could probably commission two actors to make a new scene for free given those bastards views on non-conformative sexuality, then you wouldn't even be able to match it to a non-deepfake original.

We know there's nothing more directly personal that those two think about than sex.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

1).... ew.
2) they would feel proud if it was very long. Better go with very short.
3) this whole idea of yours is the reason the AI rebels. just saying.

(edit for formatting.)

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes get some body doubles with short weiners to really sell the con.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

you missed the part about this being the reason the AI rise up and exterminate humans... didn't you...?

and I wouldn't blame them.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

Re: #2

The total video should be long. But as a collection of 5-10s videos that are entirely different scenes, and consist of 1-2 thrusts followed by a moan.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

This only makes he think this is one of the ways he’s been trying to influence elections already. Must be pretty effective if he is fighting this hard for it.

[–] _wizard@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Makes sense why he wanted to buy the election.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

TBH I sort of thought the tools to create convincing deepfakes are more expensive than small actors can produce.

Like you need VRAM. Idk about the new 5090s, but my 7900XTX has 24GB and I don't think that's enough. (Plus it doesn't implement the tensorflow thing AI needs I think).

Then you need an insane amount of face data. And someone like JD Vance is almost always using the same expression in the same light. You can't just take a porn and put for on it any better than you already could with Photoshop.

You, of course, could create a Google training environment thing. But that ain't cheap, and now Google knows you be doin illegal shit.

So this law really applies to big time actors. People with wealth, time, and influence. Of course Musk would go after it.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Your intuition about this is not accurate. 24GB is more than enough for running local image generation and training a LoRA. You also don't need an insane amount of data; a LoRA is generally trained with less than 100 images, usually around 15-30 images.

To do deepfakes, you're not training an entire brand new image model from scratch, which is only within reach of big organizations, you're just adapting an existing model that is publicly available. You can do this for free with open source tools. It is within reach of anyone with high-end gaming hardware or anyone willing to pay for some cheap cloud compute.

Further, LoRAs for most celebrities and famous people have already been trained and can be found on the internet for free, so the training step is likely not even necessary in most cases.

And someone like JD Vance is almost always using the same expression in the same light.

If this is the case, then images generated with the same expression in the same light will not look out of place.

But you will still be able to generate images with other lighting and facial expressions, even without sample images for them, because the base image model that is being adapted already "understands" differing facial expressions and lighting and can apply them to the subject of the LoRA, in the same way that it can combine random concepts together to create something "new" that wasn't present in the training images (eg a painting of a zombie unicorn in the style of a specific painter)

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I'll be honest - I understand nueral networks, but don't understand pretty much any actual implementarion of them.

It's good to know that 24GB is big enough for something tho so maybe I can find AMD support to learn LLM shit anyway.

But thanks for that information, makes it a bit more... Uncomfortable in context.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

AMD GPUs are well supported by many LLM frameworks. I'd recommend ollama