News

35962 readers

2864 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

173

Judges, attorneys face Trump’s Salvadoran black hole (www.huffpost.com)

submitted 10 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28124788

There’s a real risk that hundreds of people sent to a brutal prison camp will never be free.

Henrry Jose Albornoz Quintero was scheduled to attend an immigration court hearing in El Paso Thursday. He didn’t. The immigration judge presiding over his case was not happy.

“He just disappeared? What happened?”

The Trump administration lawyer either could not say — or would not.

“All I can disclose at the moment is that he’s no longer in ICE custody,” the lawyer said, according to the notes of Albornoz Quintero’s attorney, who attended the hearing.

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Separately, the high court has temporarily allowed Trump to resume Alien Enemies Act expulsions, though the court said people targeted under the president’s declaration have a narrow right to make a habeas corpus claim in a conservative Texas court — a challenging argument in a challenging venue.

Habeas petitions, which require authorities to justify a person’s detention, generally depend on a given defendant being physically present in a given judicial district. What about all those already in CECOT? No court has addressed the issue head-on.

“I don’t know exactly what needs to happen. The problem is, [the Supreme Court didn’t] address what happened to the people that already got deported ... What about the toothpaste that’s already out of the tube?” Giardina asked.

“Habeas petitions go to the federal district courts where somebody is housed, or where they’re physically located,” Giardina said. “Convincing a district court [judge] in Texas that he still has jurisdiction over a habeas claim for a body that’s no longer in his jurisdiction — probably going to be a tall order. The argument would be that he was in your jurisdiction when his rights were violated, but again, never happened before.”

Yep, supreme court gets to pretend to be against some flagrant human rights violation to keep up their appearances while making sure nobody's actually able to do anything about it, that's the Roberts court we all know and hate

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Justice delayed is justice denied. There is no justice. Only cruelty.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The only thing that might be worse than being disappeared by ICE is coming face to face with Trump's black hole....

[–] MLavoisier@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wow, that’s great! Now the democrats will be able to run a new, empty platform about closing the El Salvador deportation camps!!!

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago

"We'll really get them in the mid-terms now! In two years... from amid the ruins... if we've not been deported."