this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

67603 readers
117 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As a default judgement because they don't know who runs it lol.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah like duh it's right there in the name, how hard can it be to find her?

[–] Proteus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Assuming there is about 500.000 Annas in the US alone (according to Wolfram Alpha), good luck with that! :D

[–] TheMalWare@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Assuming it's not an alias lol

[–] SitD@lemy.lol 3 points 2 years ago

😤 as far as I'm concerned every Anna is guilty until proven innocent. After that we can investigate Berta.

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Arrest all the Annas, when you have immunity, they let you do it if it is an official act.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why arrest them and then have to go through such a troublesome legal process that might not even result in a conviction?

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well, maybe all 500000 will "learn their lesson", like Assange...

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good luck finding the owner, and also good luck shutting down their hundreds of torrents and thousands of peers (which will definitely never happen)

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

But they have ordered the complete destruction of all torrents!!

Which is Canute level of absurdity.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

wait'll they find out about libraries.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I hope they don't find out about libraries. I feel like usa is going to ban libraries soon because of copyright.

[–] nintendiator@feddit.cl 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No need to invoke copyright. They'll just do it to own the libs.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

5M to protect against scraping? That sounds... a bit much, no? 34 employees with that one task for 2 years doesn't sound believable to me. Why is WorldCat worth anything anyway?

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Defendants, through the Anna’s Archive domains, have made, and continue to make, all 2.2 TB of WorldCat® data available for public download through its torrents,” OCLC wrote in the complaint it filed in an Ohio federal court.

It was 2.2 TB that is nothing...

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Seriously... I've downloaded 2TB in a week before.

I get that it's not about the bandwidth, though; it's about needing to upgrade their security since they scraped the site without needing to log in, so obviously their site wasn't secure. They're claiming IT costs as damages.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

They should have had security in place beforehand if they didn't want people to scrape their site. If AA hadn't done it someone else would have. Don't make it public if you don't want people to use it.

[–] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Also calling “improving it security” damages is kind of misleading. No its not damages, you just actually got some IT security for once