this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

409 readers
8 users here now

A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Looks monopole-like? The TX power didn't change much unless the board antenna was poorly matched to begin with. Angle the board so that the other device is in the null of the radiation pattern and the range becomes awful

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It won't broadcast well directly above the antenna and directly below. It's a small device so orientation will matter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

This is why I've never been a fan of the on PCB antenna.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

And why this antenna design?