this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

405 readers
17 users here now

A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Looks monopole-like? The TX power didn't change much unless the board antenna was poorly matched to begin with. Angle the board so that the other device is in the null of the radiation pattern and the range becomes awful

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It won't broadcast well directly above the antenna and directly below. It's a small device so orientation will matter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

This is why I've never been a fan of the on PCB antenna.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

And why this antenna design?