this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
351 points (99.2% liked)

politics

22813 readers
3033 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • By "The US" they mean Republicans.
  • By "acute strain" they mean that the balance of power doesn't utterly favor capital over labor.

This post uses a gift link which may have a view count limit. If it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Republicans constantly pulling humanity backwards. Child labor!?! WHAT? It's never enough for these greedy pigs. Now they want to profit from stealing childhood from kids. So sick and utterly depraved!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

All the while businesses are making record profits…

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I recently produced a radio drama on what life was life before we had child labor laws, and how they came about. If you're interested, it's called "Florence Kelley, The Children's Champion."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

What's with the bs headlines?? there is no "may be", they already did

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I guess they wanted to keep the suffering and exploitation local too

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There’s no labor shortage, there’s a livable wage shortage

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Kids can be paid less, some tycoon somewhere probably...

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They sure are trying to bring back the 1890s.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago

They aren't trying, they're succeeding.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I thought they'd stop at the 1930s, but it seems that your're plunging into the depth of history much faster than expected. You guys ought to sharpen your stone carving skills at this rate.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A good part of the Southern US economy was originally based on slave labour and since its abolition the business culture and mentality never moved on from it. They've just found new ways to have cheap labour that they can exploit to different levels. Immigrants, "unskilled" workers, rented prison labour... Now that the immigrant workers are being kicked out, they're looking for replacements to fill the gap.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Anything to avoid paying a living wage holy shit

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

Pay more. It's that simple. They're greedy.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

And I'm willing to bet that it's all the same states where they make the biggest noise about how much they care about the kids while also wanting to marry them and fuck them.

This is one of the biggest reasons that I think reason number 1 that Trump and co won is hatred. Full stop. You can't claim that it was some attempt to protect children from the 'woke agenda' when you instead supported people that have had a reputation and tendency to want to marry, fuck and send children to work in the mines for decades now.

You can't claim it was for a better economy when Trump has a well known history of even bankrupting casinos and spent his entire previous presidency golfing. You can't claim it's 'anti-establishment' when all of the richest people in the world are amassing more power than ever before. You can't claim it's about freedom when we all watched Trump allow Erdogan's bodyguards to rough up American citizens on American soil the last time Trump was in charge. And you can't claim it's for 'free speech' when people get sent to prison for political beliefs.

It's nothing but hatred. These dumb fucking inbred clowns hate so strongly that they were willing to not only sacrifice the rights of their own mothers and sisters and daughters but were also willing to let their children grow up in a world run by known kiddie fiddlers with article after article backing up the evidence that the biggest pedos around are southern republicans and preachers.

Hateful, evil, profoundly fucking stupid people.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

First they loosen the restriction OF work and next they'll tighten the restriction TO work. Guess what kids in juvenile hall gonna be doing soon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Cotton farming?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

What... young, nearly adult folks want to get a paycheck, too. At 16 I used to make 450$ a week cutting grass, ain't nothing wrong with kids earning a few bucks.

These kids aren't forced labor, I wasn't, but I did live like a king at 16.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don’t forget about fucking up social security, pensions, and 401(k) accounts. You need the old people in the workforce to train the kids. Everyone I know who can sew is like 75.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Theres a culture chasm between old and young that the oldsters have no willingness to work to cross, and they overvalue their insights. On top of that they dont understand how much harder things are now than they used to be. Their entire context is so dated its erroneous anymore.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

I get it but I’m not sure our septua/octogeneraian leadership does.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Soon kids will get cigars, whiskey and married at 13 again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

"They yearn for the mines, obviously. Why do you think the kids play so much Minecraft?" -Some Republican, probably-

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The only way they will get manufacturing back in the US at the scale and cost they need is by eroding worker rights and increasing the cheap labour pool. And when you consider they also want to get rid of all illegals and migrants and anyone non-white really, all that’s left is the children.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Children and prison slave labor.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And the uneducated.

Which, well they’re getting rid of that, too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

They are doing a pretty good job of chasing away the educated too

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its amazing to me teens so eagerly sign up for minimum wage. McDonald's and the rest pay nothing and treat you like meat. Working for tips ain't it either.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

You got to buy a car somehow. When I was 16 I got a job a McDonald's just to do that. Took me 6 months of saving at $4.25/hr. to purchase a $2000 1979 Ford Bronco. Got 6 miles to the gallon and gas was around $.50/gallon. Insurance was around $25/mo. All of this and 4-6 CDs per payday was feasible on that pay.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Isnt the whole point of tarrifs to make sure goods meet our very strict labour laws? :(

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Already happening.