this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
229 points (94.9% liked)

Games

18446 readers
966 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

The scope of the game is a $3b project, i'll be seriously impressed if they get it half done for 800m.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think $800m may be enough to place it as the biggest scam in gaming industry history.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

India launched a lunar probe for a lot less.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I've never put any money in this game. I remember I feel like a decade+ ago they had that ship hanger demo that was the only thing available at the time. I think I installed that. Whatever. If people fund this game and it ends up solid someday I'll enjoy it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

most expensive-to-develop video game?
(provided it all actually goes towards that)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I wouldn't say game. Games are fun. Tech demo or simulation maybe.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›