this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
352 points (99.4% liked)

politics

22813 readers
3046 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After the biggest anti-Trump protests since the 2017 Women’s March, many major media outlets seemed intent on downplaying the size and significance of the massive demonstration of opposition.

The Hands Off! protests took place on April 5 in 1,400 locations across the country, with solidarity rallies in Europe and Canada. Volunteer organizers said the events were aimed at opposing billionaire government and corruption; cuts to Social Security, Medicaid and other vital programs; and attacks on immigrants, trans people and other vulnerable groups. At a conservative minimum, hundreds of thousands of people turned out to resist the Trump administration’s many assaults on democracy; organizers estimate the total reached into the millions.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The revolution will not be televised.

It won't be on social media, either, and it sure as shit won't be on Tik Tok.

If they don't see it coming, so much the better. This isn't a popularity contest, it's an existential struggle.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If they don't see it coming, so much the better.

No, we kinda NEED the media and the world to know and pay attention

This isn't a popularity contest, it's an existential struggle.

That's just it, though, it's both: in terms of raw violent power, we have 0 chance of beating the government that controls the most powerful military in the world and who most cops are not just professionally, but also ideologically on the side of.

The only way to topple a government apparatus that powerful is to make it so hated as to be untenable.

That doesn't happen until the atrocities they commit are undeniable in both cruelty and scope, and if a lack of media coverage minimizes the scope, that breaking point may never come.

The complicit billionaire-owned media KNOWS this, which is WHY they're systematically doing so.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

While it would be nice for the media to share, we can't force them. We don't own them. That's why we need to share it. That's why we need to take pictures of the crowds, show evidence that millions show e up.

I think you misunderstand one small part of that powerful military - we're so blended in this country, you can't just bomb rebel strongholds because your own supporters are there too. That may be acceptable in a small part, but then his supporters get pissed off.

We also massively outnumber the military. The Navy can't do much on the inner united states.

If there is one thing any powerful organized military will always struggle to fight against, it's guerilla warfare. Improvised weapons are particularly devastating because they're unpredictable. We've seen how effective the "force multiplier" aspect is in theaters like Iraq and Afghanistan. It's essentially not.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, we kinda NEED the media and the world to know and pay attention

They can only hold the lid down on the pressure cooker for so long. And their power only comes from our believing in it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

The police and military exist whether you believe in them or not

[–] [email protected] 53 points 3 days ago

There were two telling things for me in the coverage.

First, it was always "thousands" of people at the event. Not tens of thousands like in Boston. Not something on the order of 100,000 or more in NYC (it stretched for 20 BLOCKS). All over the media "thousands" of protesters. Not "millions attend Anti-Trump rallies across US cities" like the National Post wrote.

The coverage tried to make it sound like this was 1,200 mostly insignificant protests across the country.

Second, most of the news websites weren't covering it live. And when it finally made the front page later that day or the next morning, it was 2/3/4 stories down.

Now ... compare that to what happened in South Korea. Yes, a very different ballgame, but it was halfway across the world and ALL of the news media were treating it as breaking news and halting all other coverage.

That protest had about 1 million people.

Our protests had about 5,000,000 people across the country.

It should have been covered as a much bigger deal.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

When regular working people eventually win, we're going to have to reinstitute all the controls that we had for decades preventing single corporations from owning too much of the media. Break it up into little pieces. One of the first things corporations did when they got their first man, Reagan, in power was consolidate the airwaves; they know that's the tool necessary for them to repeat and spread lies, and without this tool, they're going to lose.

It's not an accident that Sinclair owns most of the local tv stations broadcasting to rural markets and that all the AM radio stations are run by a small handful of Conservative propagandists.

We've gotta get that shit shut down--a limit on the number of stations any company can own, massive fines for violating standards of truthfulness, etc.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If the main way rich people get their news is through network TV, doesn't that give protesters an advantage? If the movement is larger than rich people expect it to be, they'll dismiss it until it's too big to ignore.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago