this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
138 points (97.3% liked)

Fediverse memes

1245 readers
538 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
Specific

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I have faith in you, you can do it! :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Hopefully I didn't jinx the great instance 🀞

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago

Me when I see the instance I joined a year ago and am barely involved with being praised.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 days ago (1 children)

19.11 is definitely one of the best lemmy updates as it fixes moderation and allows vote checking.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I thought those things were there prior to 0.19.11?

Edit: Sorry, mods viewing votes is new in .11, previously only Admins could do that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's a new donation dialog box also included in this patch. The new features are pretty minor though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think it also has things like emailing a registrant when their application is approved/denied among other small things. But Admins viewing votes was some time ago I thought (feels like 6 months or a year ago). Functions for easily finding moderation history and some related stuff were more recent, from memory.

Edit: Oh sorry, vote viewing is new for mods! I missed that because it wasn't in the bullet-pointed list.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Vote checking in the default UI is new to .11, on previous versions mods had to use Tesseract

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Beehaw's been holding back because they want to switch to Sublinks, and going past 0.18.4 would've made migration harder. But Sublinks has been slow to be ready and it's getting untenable to wait much longer, so they'll be upgrading to the latest Lemmy sometime. I'll be happy to finally switch to the actual app version of Voyager when they do, for now I've been self-hosting the last version of the web app that worked.

https://beehaw.org/post/18771220

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is the development still ongoing for sublinks?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Their freshest commit is 4 months ago πŸ’€

There’s always Piefed if they want to avoid Lemmy completely, Jlai.lu and Dubvee are migrating to it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Oh Jlai.lu? I didn’t know. Very cool!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What is sublinks? An alternative to Lemmy?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

It was a planned alternative to Lemmy as many felt uncomfortable about the og developers being tankies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I think that was the more recent plan, though I don’t have a source

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Everyone knows 9.5 is more than 9.11 except devs, apparently

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's standard semantic versioning. not mathematic decimal. In case it helps to understand this, the full version is 0.19.11 which is clearly not a valid mathematical number.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

ChatGPT disagrees. I asked: "Hello there I have a question. Which is bigger: 9.5 or 9.11?"

9.11 is bigger than 9.5. The number 9.11 is greater because when you compare them as decimals, 9.11 is equivalent to 9.110, which is greater than 9.5.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

My ChatGPT says:

9.5 is bigger than 9.11.

This can be confusing because "9.11" might look like it's greater due to the extra digit, but it's not. Think of both numbers as decimals:

9.5 is the same as 9.50

9.11 stays as 9.11

Now compare: 9.50 > 9.11, just like 50 > 11 after the decimal point.

Let me know if you want a visual or a trick to remember this!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

I thought it was funny that it made such a basic mistake, but I'll be sure to ask you before posting such things in the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I just joined the 0.9.11 gang today!

0.18.4 is old, wonder whether some federation issues are present because of that.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Last I checked, Beehaw wanted to switch platforms entirely, so tgey don't bother keeping up with Lemmy updates.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

That's what I heard at well, I'm surprised it's still pending though

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Beehaw seems kind of big on intentionally being a kind of curated garden instance, so they may welcome a certain amount of federation breaking.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Nice, Lemmings.world is keeping up with the times like Lemmy.ca 😏

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Your people thank you for your service, oh glorious leader.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Hmm, I might add this to the rules: always address the main admin as "glorious leader."

Thanks for the idea!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Thank you for posting about this! Didn't know 0.19.11's out :^) will try to convince db0 to update.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's not that I don't want to, it's just that I'd like to see if instances breaks after updates or if new bugs are introduced because the QA of lemmy is abysmal chems

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lemmy has no QA, only testing in production ;)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

We have a large group of testers; they're called "users"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Funnily enough you missed the top admin, @[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

I missed the i at the end of their name πŸ˜…

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί