this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
-5 points (27.3% liked)

Public Health

595 readers
25 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link ([email protected])


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An analysis by the U.S. Defense Department’s intelligence agency concluded five years ago that the virus that caused COVID-19 could have been engineered in a Chinese laboratory and later escaped to spawn the pandemic that eventually killed millions of people, recently released documents obtained by US Right to Know show.

The never-before-published analysis by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) points out that the lab in question – the Wuhan Institute of Virology – was highly capable of genetic manipulation, and includes an assessment that the genome of the coronavirus strain that caused COVID-19 is “consistent with the hypothesis” that it was “a lab-engineered virus” that “escaped from containment.”

The analysis by scientists in the DIA, which is charged with collecting and analyzing medical and health intelligence as part of its operations, also concluded that the virus that became known as SARS-CoV-2 could have come from “a bank” of bat coronaviruses in the Wuhan lab that was under the research of senior virologist, Dr. Shi Zhengli.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

This story is and always has been a gigantic nothing-burger. The science is not settled, which means many hypotheses could be true or could be false.

The problem, is who the fuck cares? Is there any difference whatsoever if its man made or natural, in how we should act or what decisions we should make? Can we do anything to prevent bio engineering in a foreign country?

No. No, there is no practical difference, no, we cannot prevent research in other countries, and we probably shouldn't even try since the goal is not practical.

One gigantic red herring.