this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

ISO8601

205 readers
1 users here now

Community dedicated to the international standard YYYY-MM-DD date format.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] donuts@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Probably because the mods are Americans

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

RFC forever (unless my job is paying for it),

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I might be an idiot, but I've never understood how it can't be free. How can a format of a timestamp not be free?

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

Capitalism!

But technically is not the standard itself that is not free, it's the official documents and certifications. For example, my understanding is you have to pay quite hefty coin for the C++ Standard to be "compliant", otherwise you are just working with a "draft" that is not "official" despite being identical in all but at most the name and credits section.

[–] Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 days ago

And they chose the worst version possible