this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
4 points (62.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2717 readers
1009 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived

A U.S. electric vehicle battery manufacturer with ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has suspended its permit application to build a plant near a Michigan National Guard base following fierce opposition.

Chuck Thelen, CEO of Gotion Inc. — a “wholly owned and controlled” subsidiary of Chinese company Hefei Gotion High-Tech Power Energy Co. Ltd. (Gotion High-Tech) — said the decision stemmed from the firm’s ongoing breach of contract lawsuit against Green Charter Township, according to the Big Rapids Pioneer. The township soured on the $2.4 billion project in November 2023 after voters recalled numerous officials following a series of reports revealing Gotion and its Chinese parent company’s ties to the CCP.

“I applaud the people of Mecosta County as Gotion pauses their permitting process, but their fight is not over,” Republican Michigan Rep. John Moolenaar, chair of the House Select Committee on the CCP, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Gotion must announce it will finally listen to the people, and end its projects for good.”

[...]

Questions about Gotion’s CCP-ties began to arise around March 2023 when The Midwesterner reported Gotion High-Tech’s “Articles of Association” required the firm to establish a “Party organization and carry out Party activities in accordance with the Constitution of the Communist Party of China.”

[...]

The House Select Committee on the CCP investigated Gotion High-Tech in 2024 and “found their supply chains are reliant on forced labor as part of the CCP’s ongoing genocide of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang Province,” Mooleenaar told the DCNF.

[...]

Meanwhile, Michigan residents — like Joseph Cella, the director of the Michigan-China Economic and Security Review Group — engaged in grassroots activism to oppose the CCP-tied company. Cella served as the U.S. Ambassador to Fiji during the first Trump administration.

[...]

“[They] refused to follow the directives given to state and local governments on dealings with China-based companies to exercise vigilance, conduct due diligence, and ensure transparency, integrity, and accountability are built into the partnership to guard against potential foreign government exploitation,” Cella said. “It is important that executive branch agencies, Congress, the Michigan Legislature, and citizens continue to scrutinize and investigate this ‘deal.’”

[...]

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao what a shit conservative title. Practically seethes with nationalist zeal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Its not about nationalism. Nobody would care if this was a Taiwan company. Communist China is a dictatorship that has killed tens if not hundreds of millions of Chinese. The current dictator was supposed to step down after 10 years but he didn't do that.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Its not about nationalism.

Says the party that can't stop squealing American First every chance they get. Cut the bullshit, nobody with half a brain cell left is falling for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 29 minutes ago

Says the party that can’t stop squealing American First every chance they get.

I'm not in that party. I am Dem. And it is not about nationalism. The Chinese dictatorship has killed tens of millions of Chinese. Why is a dictator okay for Chinese but not for Americans? To be thinking that sounds racist to me.

Cut the bullshit, nobody with half a brain cell left is falling for it.

LMFAO. Nobody with half a brain cell left thinks it is okay for China to have a dictator who has killed millions of Chinese. It also sounds racist to be thinking it was okay that someone killed tens of millions of Chinese as if their lives aren't important.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

The AXIS OF EVIL (2025 edition)

Traitorapist Trump - War Criminal Putin - Comrade Xi - Caligula Jong Un

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Anti-CCP rhetoric from white rural conservatives is just patent racism washed with a political guise. Every business in China has "ties to the CCP." That's how it works over there

So much for autarky lmao

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Every business in China has “ties to the CCP.” That’s how it works over there

Than that proves that China is extremely fucked up. What is the justification for the CCP to exist at all if it is going to manage a bunch of capitalist corporations? How come they haven't dissolved the Communist Party since it serves no purpose except to enrich the dictators and elites?

Anti-CCP rhetoric from white rural conservatives is just patent racism

That makes no sense since there is no bias against the Republic of China on Taiwan.

This link shows that the CCP has literally caused the deaths of tens if not hundreds of millions of Chinese. Why the fuck would anybody NOT be "anti-CCP"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Than that proves that China is extremely fucked up. What is the justification for the CCP to exist at all if it is going to manage a bunch of capitalist corporations? How come they haven't dissolved the Communist Party since it serves no purpose except to enrich the dictators and elites?

The exact same can be said about the US, Bozo

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 minutes ago

The exact same can be said about the US, Bozo

No it can't, stupid person. The US doesn't have an anti-capitalist political party that owns all the capitalist corporations and doesn't allow the people to chose their own leaders from other parties or even the leader of the only party.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

This is not anti-CCP rhetoric, the CCP's influence on private businesses is a simple fact that isn't even denied by the CCP.

For example, the party's infiltration of the private sector gained momentum already after then-president Jiang Zemin called in the early 2000s for the CCP to represent "the advanced productive force" and welcome China's emerging private entrepreneurs.

Since Xi Jinping came to power in 2014, the CCP's influence on private businesses have intensified (with the disappearance of entrepreneur Jack Ma after he criticized the CCP supposedly being the most prominent case).

You'll find ample evidence for the the systematic ways in which the Chinese party-state has been interfering in the private sector. So called "CCP branches" within private firms -meant as a potential lever of control, alongside regulatory tools - are a key of that effort. In recent years, the number of these "party units" has increased dramatically, and the CCP branches have strengthened their role in private companies' management.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is absolutely nationalist rhetoric from a conservative paper. Not only that, but the title is absolute nonsense. The CCP didn’t almost take over a town, and anyone who thinks they did is an idiot.

Oh, don’t get me wrong, they would love to control American towns, but they do not, nor have they come close to. You should be ashamed for even posting this tripe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 minutes ago

It's not 'nationalist rhetoric' to be wary of dictatorships. Nobody would care if this was a corporation from the Republic of China. That is the country and people that Americans were huge friends with during and before WWII.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

This comment here is a prime example of not having issues with any of the actual problematic aspects and is instead entirely fueled by "fear of the other".

The #1 priority of any state is maintaining their power. I apologize for the highly reductionist argument but:

Within the USA the private sector is, de facto, the super-executive branch of the state. It has "systematic ways" that it "interferes" with what it's supposed to be a "democratic" state. Sure there's a couple hundred oligarchs who all have competing ideas and visions but they, generally, understand that #1 rule.

Within China the CCP is, de facto, the super-executive branch of the state. It has "systematic ways" that it "interferes" with what it's supposed to be a "democratic" state. Sure there's a couple hundred general committee members who all have competing ideas and visions but they, generally, understand that #1 rule.

Within the USA any attempts at pulling power out of the "private sector" is a direct threat and any ideas around a "strong public sector" are a direct threat which is meet with propaganda, repression and violence.

Within China any attempts at pulling power out of the "public sector" is a direct threat and any ideas around a "strong private sector" are a direct threat which is meet with propaganda, repression and violence.

If your argument is honestly one against repression then stop spreading USA propaganda. Everyone knows that's how the CCP works. If you're going to convince anybody you need to evaluate and explain why it works that way and why it's a "problem".

As an example, the Jack Ma example is a particularly salient one as it would be, imo, comparable to Elon Musk being disappeared not long after floating the idea of DOGE. However your attempt to invoke comparisons to protest movements in the US; IE Fred Hampton, the Furgeson 6, 2020 disappearances, Columbia U ICE raids etc. feels disingenuous to me. Could you expand on that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Did they also eat the dogs or did they import fentanyl?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

The House Select Committee on the CCP investigated Gotion High-Tech in 2024 and “found their supply chains are reliant on forced labor as part of the CCP’s ongoing genocide of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang Province,” Mooleenaar told the DCNF.

Reminder that the US has more people in its prison system than China, despite having a much smaller population.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Reminder, that we know of. China doesn't really publish the numbers in any verifiable form. Nor are there any third parties really able to audit it.

Further even if what you say is true it doesn't make what China is doing right.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It's just not very credible. US police also kill and hospitalize more people than Chinese police. US politicians have no room to criticize any other country's law enforcement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 minutes ago

. US police also kill and hospitalize more people than Chinese police.

LMFAO you aren't the slightest bit credible. Just in this one region alone the Chinese dictatorship threw in jail 1 million people none of whom were criminals.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-22278037

[China has been accused of committing crimes against humanity and possibly genocide against the Uyghur population and other mostly-Muslim ethnic groups in the north-western region of Xinjiang.

Human rights groups believe China has detained more than one million Uyghurs against their will over the past few years in a large network of what the state calls "re-education camps", and sentenced hundreds of thousands to prison terms.

A series of police files obtained by the BBC in 2022 has revealed details of China's use of these camps and described the routine use of armed officers and the existence of a shoot-to-kill policy for those trying to escape.

The US is among several countries to have previously accused China of committing genocide in Xinjiang. The leading human rights groups Amnesty and Human Rights Watch have published reports accusing China of crimes against humanity.]

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. They absolutely have every right to and often are right to. That doesn't mean they're not hypocritical at times. But just because someone is hypocritical doesn't mean they're wrong.

Unless they are a campist trying to deflect critique with a but somebody else might be worse claim.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You need to actually assess the motivations and credibility of the accusor, not just blindly accept the things they claim. This isn't just a hypocrite, this is a politician with an agenda.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago

China exerts extreme control over businesses that operate from there. That's a simple fact. This individuals motivations aren't extremely relevant.

Might their motivations be alarmist? Perhaps. Might they be protectionist? There's a very good chance. Xenophobic and bigoted. Knowing human nature the odds are good. How does any of that change the fact that the Chinese government has tight controls over all businesses within their border? Again that is a simple fact. And makes this concern not unwarranted. Let's phrase it this way. Would you be defending a US state-controlled organization from doing similar in China? I doubt it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

They missed out on an improvement in government.