this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
54 points (90.9% liked)

Selfhosted

56978 readers
662 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey there, it's me again with my cursed project. Last time is said "i basically reinvented Kubernetes". But the voices won and I legit did.

Last time it was a cursed novelty. A random script made by some autistic dude with too much time on its hand.

Now it's become its own project, with ecosystem and overpriced .io domain. For no reason other than : It's cursed, but it works beautifully.

Every Kind is handled by its distinct code. Everything is pluggable, nothing is hardcoded. The next layer of hell is for someone else to write Docker Swarm extensions. Won't be me.

I am, again, very sorry. Sorry for releasing this thing into the world as a complete, working, product.

And sorry for keeping spamming it. I will stop, i promises (the voices will never)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] androidul@lemmy.world -2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

okay the moment I saw Python I just closed it

[–] pokexpert30@jlai.lu 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I mean, it's yaml manipulation. It was either python or perl, but i wasn't fucking with perl, i'm insane not mad (or the other way around)

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Perl is perfect for curses you have no intention of maintaining. You can pack more dark magic per line.

[–] pokexpert30@jlai.lu 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you think I won't maintain this?

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

People rarely maintain open source curses. Manjaro withstanding.

[–] pokexpert30@jlai.lu 3 points 9 hours ago
[–] androidul@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Perl is way crazier than Python that’s for sure. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a nice project, Python gets you there really fast because the la gauge is loosely coupled, just that when it’s failing it’s blowing up on all ends & it’s not so deterministic, meaning what you run on machine-a will be exactly the same on machine-b.

[–] dimeslime@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Curious what you would use instead? I can only think of one wrong answer and that's Jsonnet.

[–] androidul@lemmy.world -3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Would’ve written a Golang program and spit-out a binary for everyone to execute on any machine.

No dependency problems, it’s portable, it’s deterministic — all that you need. Everything is packed in that binary, dependencies, your core logic.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

You sweet summer child...

[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

You can create static binaries that bundle the python interpreter and dependencies.

It's the onefile option in pyinstaller: https://pyinstaller.org/en/stable/usage.html#cmdoption-F

You can also do it with C. Or Csharp. Or many other programming languages. It's not a feature unique to Go, it's just that Go can only create static binaries.

[–] androidul@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

not only, you can go ahead and run a Go program as is, without compiling as well 😆

TIL about the onefile, 10x for sharing, can you guarantee that runs everywhere?

go run works by compiling the program to a temporary executable and then executing that.

can you guarantee that runs everywhere

It seems to depend on glibc versions, if that's what you are asking. You can force it to be more static by using a static musl python or via other tools. Of course, a binary for Linux only runs on Linux and the same for Windows and Mac. But yeah.

Also it should be noted that go binaries that use C library dependencies are not truly standalone, often depending on glibc in similar ways. Of course, same as pyinstaller, you can use musl to make it more static.