this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
426 points (98.9% liked)
Political Humor
1912 readers
421 users here now
Welcome to Political Humor!
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other.
- No harassment.
- No sexism, racism or bigotry.
- All arguments should be made in good faith.
- No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
- All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
- No bots, spam or self-promotion.
- If you want to run a bot, ask first.
- Site wide rules apply.
- Have fun.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Under Stalin, yes, of course. That's almost as unhinged as people claiming Hitler was socialist because he had "socialist" in his party's name.
Preparing to defend against Nazi Germany without the land grabs in Eastern Europe?
They didn't amass riches for an elite and didn't build their country on racial superiority. That's closer than most to socialism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curzon_Line
Why is it a land grab if that was the start?
The "land grabs" happened after Germany started conquering. The preparations had to be made before.
I am no expert at all so please correct me if I am wrong but I think that only the SU made suggestions for, as Tolc mentions, "collective security". What else should they have done?