this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
294 points (90.8% liked)

Technology

81759 readers
3502 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Objectification, hate, rape threats: the politicians debating online abuse mean well, but to truly understand, they need to see what I see

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The article is from a UK newspaper. What is and isn't legal for them to regulate is decided by their Parliament and nobody else. No Kings, and all that.

Meanwhile, you should know that the "free speech" lectures are getting pretty old from the country that checks social media history at the border to make sure you didn't say anything bad about the Dear Leader, which shuts down TV shows it doesn't like, and generally ensures the media toes the party line.

(See also - lectures on why kids shooting up schools is a necessary price to pay for that well regulated militia that will be along to save you from tyrants, well, real soon now...)

[–] artyom@piefed.social -4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

from the country that checks social media history at the border to make sure you didn't say anything bad about the Dear Leader

That's also illegal. A rational person would argue to prevent that. An irrational person would suggest that it justifies the regulation of even more speech by an already fascist govt.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Genuinely asking here: do you think the word "illegal" means wrong?

By definition, if a sovereign government decides it's allowed to do something, it's not illegal. You could say it's unethical (though I'm not sure why you would), but you can't say it's illegal.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Genuinely asking here: do you think the word "illegal" means wrong?

...no? But I think in this particular instance, obviously yes.

if a sovereign government decides it's allowed to do something, it's not illegal

...wat? Why would that be illegal?