this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
322 points (94.7% liked)

Not The Onion

20543 readers
2092 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

"To avoid the appearance of nepotism" sounds exactly like making it his own. You seem to have misunderstood. Are you an LLM?

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The appearance of nepotism.

Nicholas Coppola got cast by his uncle, when any random 15 year old aspiring actor would never stand a chance.

He then changes his name so that other people in Hollywood will (hopefully) not say “oh he got that part because he’s Coppola’s nephew,” even if he absolutely got that job because he’s Coppola’s nephew.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world -2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not disputing that he got his first few roles due to his connections, but changing his name absolutely would have distanced him from his relatives in other directors' eyes.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago

absolutely would have distanced him from his relatives in other directors' eyes.

Nah, everyone in the industry would know about this. But random people on the street wouldn't. And that's what it's about when you want to be famous.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

No it wouldn't/didn't, but it would/did to the masses.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You have misunderstood. He was in fact the beneficiary of nepotism: starting in his uncle’s films. But to keep this a secret, he changed his name. He was hiding the nepotism, not trying to avoid nepotism.

Walk a little more softly. You came off as confidently wrong there.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 7 hours ago

ive seen quite a few actors recently try to do this or trying to downplay thier nepotism.