this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
656 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

20504 readers
1815 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A couple were told they faced a $200,000 (£146,500) medical bill when their baby was born prematurely in the US, despite them having travel insurance which covered her pregnancy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

can you really not reject citizenships?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You can, but you have to pay fees and forefit a percent of your net worth.

The baby should do it now, while their net worth is $0

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What if it doesn't get rid of its citizenship? If it never goes to the US, the US system can never do anything about it simply not paying US taxes.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

If they never go to the US or try to do business with the US, sure. It is, however, an unnecessary limitation on their future. Best to renounce the citizenship as soon as possible if they don't want to keep it.