this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
132 points (71.3% liked)

Technology

81709 readers
3699 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not specifically about systemd, but some things can't be backwards compatible because they might want to just do things different.

Nobody was forced to change, the distros saw the options and decided in favor of systemd, the same they decide a million other things.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Systemd usually can't be in the same repo with other init systems/service managers (or with shims and hacks) *, while they themselves happily coexist. This is the Reason that there are non-systemd distros, not some unreasonable hate for new thing or anything.

* Yes, except Openrc, which was made as a drop-in for Systemd.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nobody was forced to change,

Red hat dominated the market and pushed it on out. You must remember this, don't you?

[–] exu@feditown.com 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'd encourage you to go read the discussions Arch Linux and Debian had before deciding to go with systemd

Edit: fix grammar