this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
1143 points (98.4% liked)

memes

20113 readers
2901 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Would also be cheaper if the government owned the energy infrastructure and ran at cost.

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

That's not an answer. In my city for example, the water and trash service are public and price duplicated from 2024, water pipes, sanitation and all that is public infrastructure maintained by the city, the only thing private in this whole thing may be the trash trucks.

Energy is also heavily subsidized and we still have to pay a lot.

In my experience government doesn't make utilities cheaper.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If it was private, you would pay more for the same service, because the private company has all the same costs as now, but also needs to make a profit. So if you keep it public, it will cost less.

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Not necessarily, it could also be better run, more efficient with less employees.

For example maybe instead of 4 sets of at least 2 trash containers around my street there would only be 2 or 1 with all the pertinent colors (the company does more stuff than water)

But I guess this is the bad side of living in a country with more public employees than private.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That would be a reduction in the service quality, which is the other thing that always happens when utility services are privatised. So you get to pay more money for less service. The company has no incentive to provide a good service, because what else are you going to do?

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

The government has no incentive to provide a good service because what are you going to do? Stop paying?

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

China does subsidize their electricity, and are self declared communists. It seems like if it goes to corporations it would be more of a Corporatocracy however.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Ikr? What else is it? A good idea that would benefit people broadly instead of specific people narrowly?

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You want elected officials to be competent and follow the will of those whom they represent?

that's woke nonsense

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Pfft caring about anything but myself, what a suckers game.

Empathy? what woke bs is that, as a true Jesus loving Christian I hate my neighbors