this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
1394 points (99.3% liked)

Progressive Politics

4094 readers
1171 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And we can't go after the guns because patriots are going to use them in case the government ever starts doing tyrannical things like grabbing people off the streets without due process, killing protesters, breaking into houses without warrants, or threatening the voting system.

If any of that happens sometime in the future the good ol' boys will be ready to protect the Constitution and we'll understand that all the dead kids were worth it.

[–] qaeta@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

Any day now... yep... aaaanyyyy daaaayyyy now....

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Dripping with irony lmao

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

patriots are going to use them in case the government ever starts doing tyrannical things like grabbing people off the streets without due process, killing protesters, breaking into houses without warrants, or threatening the voting system

That's literally what's happening right now you troll

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that was super obviously sarcastic...

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works -2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

So they're saying we should go after guns because patriots aren't doing that, which is why I called them a troll, because they're wrong. Patriots are doing that.

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

they were saying that the "patriots" (so maga, not actual patriots) are claiming that they would step in and stop tyranny, but are actually doing the opposite.

and them claiming that that's the reason they need their guns is the most prominent reason that constantly comes up in discussions about gun control. which is true.

so they are saying that particular argument is utter bullshit, and that gun reform should disregard that argument.

and gun reform/gun control doesn't mean nobody can have guns.

it just means stricter rules on who can have them. which, yes, is a necessary legislation that every civilized country already has.

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works -2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

And I'm saying that's all bullshit, because actual patriots (not maga) ARE stepping up and using the second amendment for what it was made for. Anyone talking gun control right now is a fucking fascist masquerading as a liberal because they're scared that people are arming themselves to protect their neighborhoods.

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

so you just think dead children are an acceptable price to pay for... absolutely nothing. got it.

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works -2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

We don't need dead kids to keep the 2nd amendment strong. Thats a misconception. Gun control is a bandaid, not a real solution to the root problem of violence in this country. And if you think absolutely nothing is happening, you're either lying or not paying attention. Nice try faschy.

[–] wanderingmagus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

How did that work out for Alex Pretti?

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago

He made the mistake of being armed alone. I've yet to see reports of the armed neighborhood patrol groups being attacked by fascists though. Nice try faschy. We're not scared of you.