this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
193 points (98.5% liked)
Fuck Cars
15048 readers
461 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There's only one way to combat big ass cars.
And that's with big ass bikes!
Could he not ride in the middle instead of on top? Wow, that's crazy.
Oh sure, but then he wouldn't be able to chat with the birds as he rides to work.
Sadly people do. But they interpret the big ass bike concept very, very wrong and thus are becoming a problem all on their own...
I have written about those elsewhere, but yes, they are the product of limited or lacking guidance on creating and usage of e-bikes. New Jersey, as I imagine you know, is now on a warpath against e-bikes as a whole because of those examples you listed.
At least they will never look as cool as a two story bicycle.
And all because impractically wide and heavy bikes you wouldn't even want to ride on urban streets make it cheaper to install oversized motors and batteries. Impressive how bikes and ebikes are still fighting to be taken seriously but the idiots have already found a way to exploit it for their quasi-legal dream competely unregulated motorbikes.
All your link displayed as page not found for me :/
Oh... seems like Startpage has heavily changed how long their anonymous search results are kept... Guess from now on I need to do the addtional clicks again to actually go to the original sources and directly pictures again. Sorry about that...
It were all picture of oversized fatbikes but on normal bike lanes, where there are zero benefits to use a heavier and more cumbersome bike. Those are used in normal urban environment for only one reason: it's cheaper to install an oversized battery and oversized motor in an oversized bike, to then terrorize normal bikers with speeds you shouldn't drive between other bikes (and the weight to match).
Where I live that is actually illegal as ebikes have indeed limits. Which is just ignored by those morons, as the speed limiters making those abominations legal are purely software (and can of course be deactivated if you know how). And as there is -rightfully so- no widespread mandatory checkup for "bikes" they won't rarely get caught anyway.