this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
479 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

29783 readers
1241 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
479
Overcome (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) by Lisk91@sh.itjust.works to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 24 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I'm no audiophile, but wouldn't that plug fit into the port right next to it?

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 41 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Headphone jack is an output. The jack they've hotwired is an input.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 74 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 20 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Before the mid-to-late 1990s, on the other hand...

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 20 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Connecting cables was easy, the nightmare was getting the OS to recognise the devices.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but there were so many different cable standards that you weren't always sure you had the right one on hand. USB has been such a godsend that the young'ns will never fully appreciate.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 7 points 9 hours ago

That's what the Cable Box™ was for. The only time a self respecting cable collector would not have the right cable was the week after getting rid of some of the most "legacy" cables.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago

You better hold onto those driver discs.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's hard to tell with the wire covering part of the label.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

You can see enough to tell it's an I (in), not an O (out) - plus the fact there's only room for one more letter behind the copper, as demonstrated by the hidden P in "TAPE" above. Having dealt with this sort of equipment enough in my life, those were really the only two possibilities.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 11 points 14 hours ago

It's hard to see behind the copper but I'm pretty sure that is "Tape in", an input, while the headphones next to it would be an output

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Others have already pointed out this is the tape in and that's the headphone jack. To the left is an effects send and return which is after the preamp but before the power amp (it's an in and an out where you'd plug in certain effects pedals). Far to the left is the instrument input. Depending on the specific signal you could probably route it through the effects return which bypasses the distortion of the preamp. I'd have to see exactly what the fuck they thought they were trying to accomplish.

The color of it makes me think of the old Peavey Rage 158 amps but they didn't have an effects loop or tape in. So I'm not exactly sure which amp this is. The far right knob is the master volume and the one left of the effects loop is reverb. That's not important but it's interesting to me.