this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
28 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

56368 readers
1250 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Can someone recommend some self-hosted or not, tool that I could schedule for periodical scans of all I host and is exposed to public internet?

I think I did all by the book now, including crowdsec and/or fail2ban, but recently for example I got an email from German CERT that my n8n is out of date and has some CVEs. All of them were not exploitable in my case but that got me thinking that if CERT can do it, maybe there are some services or tools that I could use and get alerts sooner if something is vulnerable in my infrastructure.

Any recommendations welcomed! Ideally self hosted and FOSS of course.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Instead of trying to automatically scan your environment, it's probably better to figure out how to automatically update applications first. CVE's eventually get patched.

[–] sznowicki@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Having one didn’t mean the other is not useful.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Auto updating can be a problem. Take a look at the CrowdStrike fiasco a couple years back.

[–] exu@feditown.com 1 points 1 day ago

That's why you have regular snapshots, backups and monitoring

[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If your software updates between stable releases break, the root cause is the vendor, rather than auto updating. There exist many projects that manage to auto update without causing problems. For example, Debian doesn't even do features or bugfixes, but only updates apps with security patches for maximum compatibility.

Crowdstrike auto updating also had issues on Linux, even before the big windows bsod incident.

https://www.neowin.net/news/crowdstrike-broke-debian-and-rocky-linux-months-ago-but-no-one-noticed/

It's not the fault of the auto update process, but instead the lack of QA at crowdstrike. And it's the responsibility of the system administrators to vet their software vendors and ensure the models in use don't cause issues like this. Thousands of orgs were happily using Debian/Rocky/RHEL with autoupdates, because those distros have a model of minimal feature/bugfixes and only security patches, ensuring no fuss security auto updates for around a decade for each stable release that had already had it's software extensively tested. Stories of those breaking are few and far between.

I would rather pay attention to the success stories, than the failures. Because in a world without automatic security updates, millions of lazy organizations would be running vulnerable software unknowingly. This already happens, because not all software auto updates. But some is better than none and for all software to be vulnerable by default until a human manually touches it to update it is simply a nightmare to me.

Although I do it this way a lot of people don't. Updates break things sometimes. Bug no no for production