this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
108 points (80.3% liked)

Technology

80978 readers
4434 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Did you read my comment? My entire point was essentially that I don't care. I'm not weighing in on that.

Edit: Though, I take that back now, just because you made such a big assertion, I'll play devil's advocate.

Let's say you were using a drone for surveillance, what kind of range can you get in a drone? Looking around online, it appears that 200 km is considered extreme range for commercial drones, it's hard to find anything greater than that. That said, military drones tend to have much greater range upwards of 1500 km.

On the other hand, I see no maximum range for a pigeon, at all. There's a maximum distance it can travel per day and a maximum distance between landings that will keep it from crossing oceans. But that's it.

Secondly, a drone can be shot down. If spotted it will be targeted. So they're vulnerable. The pigeon on the other hand, if spotted, it will be ignored - because it's a pigeon. It's essentially a perfect stealth platform.

So there are two potential advantages if someone got this to work. There would of course also be drawbacks, and ultimately, who knows if it would turn out to be a viable system. But saying there's "no benefit" is silly.

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 0 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Happy we agree there's no material benefit to using live animals to do an imperfect job of what cheap drones are already doing.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

Haha, your username is ironic, you're not even honest to yourself!

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

That's not what I said, before or after my edit.