this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
399 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

80859 readers
2993 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] horse@feddit.org 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

As someone not looking to spend a ton of money on new hardware any time soon: good. The longer it takes to release faster hardware, the longer current hardware stays viable. Games aren't going to get more fun by slightly improving graphics anyway. The tech we have now is good enough.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 9 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

People don't just use computers for gaming. If this continues people will struggle to do any meaningful work on their personal computes which is definitely not good. And I'm not talking about browsing facebook but about coding, doing research, editing videos and other useful shit.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

Scientific modeling and simulations

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

If this continues people will struggle to do any meaningful work on their personal computes

Excel users devestated.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

But wait! They can pay for remote computing time for a fraction of the cost! Each month. Forever.

I fully expect personal computers to be phased out in favor of a remote-access, subscription model. AI popping would leave these big data centers with massive computational power available for use, plus it's the easiest way to track literally everything you do on your system.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

Hopefully the AI bubble popping means they have to close data centers and liquidate hardware. Dirt-cheap aftermarket servers would be good for the fediverse.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

easiest way to track literally everything you do on your system.

And ban undesired activities. "We see you're building app to track ICE agents. That's illegal. Your account was banned and all your data removed.".

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

"Remain in your cube - The Freedom Force is en route to administer freedom reeducation. Please be sure to provide proof of medical insurance prior to forced compliance."

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I fully expect personal computers to be phased out in favor of a remote-access, subscription model

I wouldn't hold my breath.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Remote computing is very expensive. It's just the gated (owned by companies) LLMs that are cheap for the final consumer. Training a 2b LLM on remote compute will cost thousands of dollars if you try to.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

2B is nothing, even 7B is tiny. Commercial API-based LLMs are like 130-200 billion parameters.

I mean yeah, training a 7B LLM from scratch on consumer-grade hardware could take weeks or months, and run up an enormous electric bill. With a decent GPU and enough VRAM you could probably shorten that to days or weeks, and you might want to power it on solar panels.

But I haven't calculated what it would take to do on rented compute.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

This is true but at the current computer prices, nowhere near as bad as it sounds. I spend £100/year or thereabouts for GeForce Now, and

  • there's no way I could play games on a £500 laptop that I renew every 5 years,
  • no way that a £1000 laptop could get me to play AAA games for more than 1-2 years
  • and sure, I could play games on a £2000 laptop, but no way that will last me 20 years.

If you have a life and can't play any more than 25 hours a week, the value proposition right now is great - there's no viable alternative that allows you to keep playing AAA games for the equivalent of £100/year.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 16 hours ago

Fuck, you almost sold me on GeForce Now. Owning is still a better value proposition for me because I get my games at... steep discounts.