this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
336 points (97.2% liked)

Not The Onion

19955 readers
931 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Though there is nothing stopping anyone from pausing a movie partway through and returning to it later.

Even though I said that, I am more reluctant to start watching a movie because of that time commitment, but I have done that when I did start some movies but wasn't really feeling like I could stay interested in the moment.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

true, but it sucks.

a movie is meant to be consumed as a unified whole. so is each tv episode. it's typically more immersive when you watch it whole.

[–] BurntWits@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

I know a lot of people who hate watching just part of a movie. I’m one of those people too, though I also don’t really like tv shows normally. I’d rather a standalone film over one in a series as well. If I’m going to watch something, I want it to start and end in the same sitting, and ideally be 90-120 minutes, though there are exceptions of course.