this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
34 points (100.0% liked)
Space
2177 readers
37 users here now
A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.
Related Communities
🔭 Science
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If New Shepard was a testbed for flying, reusing and refurbishing rockets, then it's sort of unnecessary now that New Glenn is up and flying. The space tourism angle was a way to monetize Shepard. The engineers involved can now be put to work on the next gen crew capsule and orbital tourism experience. Both of which will contribute to their lunar plans and the Artemis program.
New Shepard also did some uncrewed flights for microgravity research payloads. It had a longer weightless period than the Vomit Comet. That seems like the main value that will be lost, but the cost and staff had to be really tough to justify.