this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
104 points (99.1% liked)
Opensource
5467 readers
90 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While user consent (default on vs default off, or any choice at all) is a different-but-related topic, Mozilla bake it all in, enable it all by default, and make it difficult to disable. (Settings would be "super easy" and would show it was intended as a permanent choice.)
These aren't actions and design decisions indicative of having the best interests of users in mind. Especially given how closed the mobile client already is.
It seems to be designed in a way that leaves Mozilla the option of removing the ability to disable it, presumably if it becomes profitable enough and/or they think they can get away with it.
But for now on this point they get a pass from me on the desktop version in a personal environment where the user has the most control.
Apart from the notification that there's a new version with AI, I can't say that I've noticed AI in Firefox at all. And I haven't even bothered (as far as I remember) going anywhere to try and turn it off.
That certainly doesn't feel remotely comparable to Chrome and Chredge.
Their blog post about it seems pretty clear, and it sounds good to me.
And considering they're a non-profit, I don't see any particular reason to doubt their honesty.