this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
225 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

79879 readers
2914 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

save us vivaldi you're our only hope

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Vivaldi is in big part closed source, so we literally don't know what it does behind the scenes

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

closed source due to the small team but they're also incredibly open about both the company the advocacy for the internet

[–] RightEdofer@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago

They’re so open you can’t even see what they’re doing!

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

closed source due to the small team

There are open source projects created and managed by a single developer. A "small team" is not a reason to be closed source.

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nah, Firefox. Anything based on the blink engine is vulnerable to upstream fuckiness.

Ladybird is also getting there.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Nah, Firefox. Anything based on the blink engine is vulnerable to upstream fuckiness.

so aren't firefox forks

and ladybird might be nice but the dev outed himself as a right wing bigot

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

Firefox forks are less vulnerable purely due to the fact that the main browser engine isnt being developed by a self interested advertising company. (See the recent manifest V3 and discontinuation of V2 shitshow for a example of googles stranglehold causing problems)

& when it comes to browser engines I'll set politics aside even if someone has views in very poor taste. The project overall is FOSS and thusly is being developed by hundreds of contributors, I've contributed a few bits and pieces for it even.

Having an additional standalone browser engine serves as insurance against Mozilla doing a stupid and a bulwark against Google dominance.

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Servo browser is the other big from the ground browser project. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_%28software%29