this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
1679 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

79763 readers
3232 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 179 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Yeah. I'm actually kind of upset that I have to type 'noai'. That should be the standard.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 82 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I hope they learn their lesson from their own poll.

[–] Balinares@pawb.social 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I mean, the poll was like as not a publicity stunt, to draw attention to the fact DDG is not doing AI. All the same, the fact they are making "no AI" a selling point is noteworthy.

EDIT: I stand corrected -- apparently DDG does do AI presently. Hopefully they're serious about reconsidering that, then.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 58 points 3 days ago (2 children)

… the fact DDG is not doing AI.

They are, unless you opt out.

[–] Balinares@pawb.social 4 points 3 days ago

Thanks for the correction! I updated my comment to mention it.

[–] 123@programming.dev 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I still get a bunch of AI bullshit unless I go out of my way. Also I swear they keep reactivating it as much as google when you opt out (or select ddg no ai as your search engine in Firefox and still see that garbage).

[–] Balinares@pawb.social 1 points 3 days ago

Thanks for the correction, I was indeed wrong about that. I updated my comment accordingly.

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It'll be a cold day in hell when AI-horny suits learn the lesson that people don't want AI

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt for now.

[–] Egonallanon@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You can turn all the AI features off on regular DDG search settings. Best I can tell that achuevescthe same as using the no AI filter.

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago
[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Except it’s not very good. I turn it off and still get AI pictures and videos, and it gets rid of some pictures I know aren’t AI.

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

PR stunt exposed

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m looking forward to adding it to my browser settings as default search!

[–] JamonBear@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Already doable in Firefox, just right click in the search box then add search engine ;)

[–] teft@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just edit the ddg entry instead of adding a new one. It’s super easy to change the url for the search in settings.

I don't know how you do that. I can't edit the standard DDG on desktop at all. Didn't see anything at first glance in about:config either.

Easier to me to just add a new engine.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like kagi's approach of generating an AI overview if you end your query with a question mark. Is this a search or a question?

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not a fan of Kagi's approach to anything, frankly. The fact that they're charging money for a search engine, and using an LLM? Hard pass.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

How dare they charge money instead of selling data or ads!?

I don't have a problem with them selling ads. I have a problem with the insidious tracking that has become a part of those ads. Mojeek sells ads but doesn't track you everywhere. Also, there's SearX instances, which typically don't sell ads or data.

They also don't use LLMs. If you think Kagi isn't giving away or selling your data, think again, because the LLM is doing it as a core function.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 2 points 3 days ago

I'm pretty sure it asks you how often you want to see the AI overview doesn't it? Can't you just click never?