this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
872 points (98.8% liked)

News

36043 readers
2961 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Support among House Democrats for impeaching Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is skyrocketing, nearly doubling in the last week to 100 co-sponsors.

That's an unprecedented level of support for an impeachment effort during President Trump's second term, with lawmakers who have bristled at the topic in the past now warming to the idea.

Kelly is urging Republicans to get on board with her efforts — even as no GOP lawmaker has come close to expressing support for Noem's impeachment.

"As Secretary Noem continues to lie, obstruct Congress, and violate people's civil rights, the support for her impeachment only grows," she said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No you didn't, at least not to me. I was the one giving prescriptive statements (Vote out all incumbent democrats, elect new people who represent our values and aren't beholden to the same donors) you just pushed back on it like I was suggesting we elect more Republicans.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I said "primary all the DINOS and corporate shills." I gave 3 examples, but by the end of the line that could end up being everyone. AOC, Bernie, and Now Mamdani don't have their hands clean, just cleaner than their colleagues.

The US system has two rounds of voting. The primary and the general. When you say "vote them out" it sounds like you are calling on voters to put Republicans into power to punish the Democrats.

That never works and it results in harms like we are seeing now.

Maybe you mean "vote green or some other third party" but even then, the American Green party is funded and supported by Moscow as a means to destabilize politics over here. Trying to grow a third party is even more magical thinking than my plan,which is already puenin the sky but it's the only thing that has worked since 1860.

Voters in my country are dumb. Even politically engaged voters who read Lemmy threads. You need to be specific because there is always a right and a wrong choice even when they both suck.

Vote them out is a call to support their opponents in the general election. Vote third party is a call to support the policies opposite to what you want.

"Primary them" is a call to move the party to what you want.

If you want a general strike until they meet our demands, well, the third party idea is more likely to work than that.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This is the only thing you said to me. Just hit "show context" to see the whole thread. You're either tripping over yourself because you're energized and angry, or you're confused because you were talking to someone else and you're not reading what I'm typing.

This is absolute bullshit. When democrats controlled the white house and Senate this didn’t happen. The parties are not the same and the constant refrain that they are is a malicious lie.

to which I said:

"I am not saying don’t empower Democrats, the DNC is just a container, we vote out the previous contents of that container and put new contents in. It has worked before and we need to do it again."

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Then we don't really disagree here.