this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
887 points (98.7% liked)

Political Humor

1682 readers
1216 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Nah that's how it was conventionally interpreted (as a collective not individual right). You're giving a c20 reinterpretation and claiming it was original.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not giving anything. I'm just saying how it is currently viewed.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You sure seemed to be implying that that is how it was always viewed ("to change the meaning you need another amendment then"), come on now.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I'm giving my current understanding of the situation. I didn't come up with either interpretation.