this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
1016 points (99.3% liked)

World News

52179 readers
3016 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary: Republicans are 50/50, everyone else is strongly opposed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 225 points 5 days ago (7 children)

75% is an awfully low number.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 132 points 5 days ago (1 children)

25% of people being propagandised beyond reason is a high number, yes.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 24 points 5 days ago

Truthfully at this point I'm satisfied that 15% aren't undecided on the issue

[–] protist@mander.xyz 78 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Hitting 75% agreement in US politics is honestly unusual today, so I think it's a good sign that Trump has domestic opposition on this one

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Unusual? "Breathing" would struggle to break 60%. 75% is functionally unanimous.

[–] Tuuktuuk@anarchist.nexus -3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Not in US politics. If you have 51% of votes of whoever is The Party at the moment, you can make decisions without others impeding on them.

If one party got 51 % of votes, then that means 26,01 % of all votes is enough to decide about the all of the country's things alone.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Domestic opposition doesn't mean shit if they don't do anything about it.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 19 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] Soulcreator@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

One interesting point in the article you posted rather than OP's is that according to Ipsos only 17% of Americans approve of taking Greenland. I have no clue what the truth is but that number 'feels' a little more accurate.

In short that would mean 17% of Americans are ride or die MAGA which sadly is a believable number.

[–] illi@piefed.social 9 points 5 days ago

Do keep in mind there usually is a "I don't know" option. So both numbers can be true.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Note that violent means only had 4%. So 13% wouldn't mind a peaceful purchase. Which is still dumb but at least not as outright insane as Stephen Miller would go.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 9 points 5 days ago

You'll excuse me if I don't put much stock in the promises of Republican lawmakers. Particularly Murkowski.

Ask yourself, honestly, what will they do when push comes to shove?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I didn't know if that's "doing" anytime. It's all rhetoric.

They also said all sorts of stuff about curbing his actions in Venezuela but when it came time to vote they couldn't even get it to need a veto.

Maybe violating European sovereignty is a bridge enough to actually pass something, but I expect them to just let the veto happen

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 4 days ago

To be fair, all Trump has done on this is espew rhetoric also

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Didn't Trump pass an internet privacy bill in his first term with like 7% approval? Wasn't his first Healthcare plan also around that approval, though that didn't pass. Isn't national background checks for gun sales at like 95%? Why do people think their opinion matters?

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think these polls are good to put our opinions on the public record.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 0 points 5 days ago

Yeah, but they also make it clear to the world that we don't live in a democracy. Especially when we go around trying to spread it around the world.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

25% is a huge tipping point for social dynamics.

If he loses just a little more support the whole MAGA movement will begin to unravel.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

People are made vulnerable to their idol going haywire - by the need to rationalize having supported him. Thus the 50% of Republicans who bluescreened with "great leader always correct". If they have time to read up on the issue, it will drop a bit.

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 39 points 5 days ago

read

making big assumptions here

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 10 points 5 days ago

"They did not choose to read up on the issue."

-Narrator

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

You could probably poll 10,000 random Americans and find about 25% that would be in favor of eating lightbulbs and severing diplomatic ties with the magical land of Oz. That bottom 25% of Americans has got some real issues.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Polls are the most reliable way to be disappointed in humanity.

[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

25% of Americans being in favour of invading a NATO country without provocation is insane levels of crazy

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

OP's poll doesn't say anything about military action. It just asks whether the US should try to acquire Greenland.

The Qunnipiac poll shows that when the question explicitly includes military action, opposition is 86%: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-voters-widely-opposed-taking-greenland-military-force/story?id=129280864