this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
128 points (97.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36678 readers
1411 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The WHO did a meta analysis, which is how they came to their conclusion.

The title "No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health" is slightly misleading though, since they focused on typical alcoholic beverages. There is no statement about alcohol in fruits.

Bottom line:
Drinking even a little bit of safe? Likely no.
Eating : unknown

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

From the WHO article:

Ethanol (alcohol) causes cancer through biological mechanisms as the compound breaks down in the body, which means that any beverage containing alcohol, regardless of its price and quality, poses a risk of developing cancer.

Risks start from the first drop

To identify a “safe” level of alcohol consumption, valid scientific evidence would need to demonstrate that at and below a certain level, there is no risk of illness or injury associated with alcohol consumption. The new WHO statement clarifies: currently available evidence cannot indicate the existence of a threshold at which the carcinogenic effects of alcohol “switch on” and start to manifest in the human body.

So no, you're wrong, it specifically says your example is not "safe". They said "beverage", but consuming alcohol laden fruit would fall in the same category. The same would go for many "non-alcoholic" beers which are <0.5% alcohol, and many other things like kombucha, baked goods, chocolate, etc. You can debate whether they're correct or not, but they were very clear that tiny amounts are not safe.

Now, it's all about risk. And the more alcohol consumed, the higher the risk of developing cancer. The question is at what point the benefits outweigh the risk. Benefits could range from vitamins, minerals, fiber and healthy compounds, to reduced social anxiety and other psychological factors.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago

Thank you for your point of view. Since I have shared the article a lot of tibes myself, it's nice to take another perspective on it.

I haven't dived very deep into the research, but from what I have gathered the research did focus on beverages. Whether the alcohol content of a alcohol-free beer also falls into this category and therefore alcohol content in apples must be considered as well, was not conclusive to me. Sure, if fruits reach alcohol levels of average alcoholic beverages I suppose it's safe to label them as problematic as well. But until then I'd like to avoid reading too much into the research, until it has been clarified whether this really does apply to alcohol levels like in fruits as well.

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is binging on fruits a thing humans do?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And why would it be any different from binging on a variety of other substances containing the same ingredient in common?

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Habit? Tradition? There are establishments in town that sell beer, wine, whiskey, or cidre. It's a thing, people do.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

From a health perspective, I mean. If wine and beer and vodka all cause cancer, well wine is closer to a rotting pear than to the other two.

(Maybe you mistook me for OP)

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 18 hours ago

I follow your logic. The alcohol in rotting fruit is the same substance in our drinks and most likely has the same effect. But, is this a problem that needs research? Who eats their booze?