this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
400 points (99.8% liked)

Memes of Production

394 readers
899 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well if you ever ask someone, "would you ever commit a crime iff you knew you could get away with it" and they say yes, you'll have found at least one example of a successfully deterred crime.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

no, you didn't. you can't prove a counterfactual.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maybe we're disagreeing on what "deterrent" means. I just mean "an incentive not to commit a crime," not "something that absolutely prevents crime." If you're just trying to prove it's an incentive at all, it's pretty easy as you only need to find one example of somebody who decided against committing a crime for fear of police.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

there's no way to know what they would have decided in a world without police

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

OK, but then you're just saying it's purely down to your prior whether or not you think police are an effective deterrent. Which is not exactly a compelling argument against police. I was kind of hoping you had something more to lean on than that.