this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
395 points (99.7% liked)

Memes of Production

380 readers
1332 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i dont believe there is any way to prove crime was deterred.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What basis do you believe this? It’s measured all the time with various methods of policing being demonstrated to both deter and not deter crimes.

You can’t reductively bark “can’t prove a counterfactual 🤪” and you’ve seemingly done zero research into the matter

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8356499/

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

this only shows correlation, not causation

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Lmaoo is this how you respond to legitimate research? No wonder nobody takes you seriously and everything you say is a joke 😂

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago

do you know how I know that you didn't read it?

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well if you ever ask someone, "would you ever commit a crime iff you knew you could get away with it" and they say yes, you'll have found at least one example of a successfully deterred crime.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no, you didn't. you can't prove a counterfactual.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe we're disagreeing on what "deterrent" means. I just mean "an incentive not to commit a crime," not "something that absolutely prevents crime." If you're just trying to prove it's an incentive at all, it's pretty easy as you only need to find one example of somebody who decided against committing a crime for fear of police.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there's no way to know what they would have decided in a world without police

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

OK, but then you're just saying it's purely down to your prior whether or not you think police are an effective deterrent. Which is not exactly a compelling argument against police. I was kind of hoping you had something more to lean on than that.