43
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
43 points (100.0% liked)
Seattle
1989 readers
71 users here now
A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why this is dumb: Complying with these kind of requirements in any meaningful way is nearly impossible. Online age verification systems are easily circumvented at best. At worst, they require users to share lots of sensitive personal information, creating a great target for hackers. So most sites will just block traffic from the state, and anyone with half a brain cell will just use a VPN to get around the block.
"Ahh, so we also ban VPNs, got it." - Actual politicians in the UK
Man, I really support the idea of preventing children from partaking in many online activities, as they've been proven harmful to kids, but there's just no good way to implement it.
I mean, the best way to protect kids from harmful online material is to do things like limit and monitor their time online. But you can't reasonably do that forever, so talk to them about the things they will encounter and keep that line of discussion open and honest. Trying to use technology to do the work of good parenting is lazy and ineffective.
Good parenting is always the answer to things like this, but parents are seemingly incapable of being good parents. That's why I support the idea of something like this, as children should be protected from these awful social media companies that could not care less about the wellbeing of these kids, and parents seem to be incapable of managing it themselves.