this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
9 points (63.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

39228 readers
813 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] presoak@lazysoci.al -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Telling me what you think about what somebody else thinks is basically the opposite of direct observation.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes. And yet staring at twenty years of them reporting the weather would not at all improve my understanding of global warming. Especially if that observation was stretched out over twenty years.

Accurately recorded and identified specific observations are necessary for scientific progress, but their mere collection is not sufficient for understanding.

Science requires us to speculate, predict, test, and refine. And if all we do is observe without even having made a prediction, we're not even testing.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Nobody said anything about only observing. And understanding does not require that we manufacture hypothesis or model. You are thinking science, which is another thing. I am thinking mere empiricism. After that there are multiple options. But yes, empirical basis is key.