this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
67 points (78.2% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8418 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It smells terribly, exposes others to negative health effects without consent and is one of the biggest causes of littering. Simply put it is a major nuisance with no benefits apart from profits for the tobacco/drug industry and addicts getting their high.

Could probably extend that to anywhere around minors in general too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

As an ex-smoker who hates the smell of cigarettes probably more than non-smokers ever will, I don't disagree in theory. But we shouldn't stop with just assaults to one sensory perception. In for a penny in for a pound as they say.

Loud-ass exhausts, booming subwoofers, and other assaults on the ears should also be banned in public. Strong colognes and perfumes...also banned in public.

Ugly sweaters, poor fashion choices, and shitty cars with anime girls painted on the side? You guessed it: They're assaults on the eyes and should be banned in public

Or we could just deal with the fact that other people like things we don't like.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those things are not no the same level as smoking.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You equate a carcinogenic cloud to an anime girl image... Buddy, that is the dumbest thing I've read in a while.

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're mostly trying to satirize the situation. Pretty sure their real opinion is, "don't get too eager to police others unless you also want to open the door to other really stupidly judgemental rules, like these."

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Just ignore the smooth brains that dont think before speaking

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I dunno, I think I'd rather smell cigarette smoke than look at those hornt up anime cars.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Second hand smoke risks have been heavily overstated.

I was shocked (as a very strong anti-smoker myself).

Even smoking itself only increases cancer risk a small amount, despite all the warnings. Though other lung issues are greater - those should be the focus to get people to quit, since they're an honest high risk.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Alcohol is the same. Something like 6% of cancer deaths are attributed to alcohol. Its easy to make it look bad (and don't get me wrong it is bad). Worldwide something like 80% of liver cancers come from Hepatitis.

Recent surveys in the U.S. have showed that 5% of parents have skipped hep b vaccines and another 4% have delayed the vaccination for hepatitis B.

Those aren't directly comparable, but a person could drink every day of their life, and be 13 times less likely to die from liver cancer because a choice their guardian made.

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Loud-ass exhausts, booming subwoofers...

These can indeed have negative health effects and are banned in many places, the latter at least after certain hours (noise complaints!). MOT inspection fails vehicles with excessively loud exhausts and in many places you can get a "rolling inspection" from a traffic officer on the road resulting in a fine or "fix-it" ticket.

Strong colognes and perfumes…also banned in public.

Don't have negative health effects on most people, though you can be asked to leave from many health care institutions if using too strong scents. Not really comparable to smoking but the argument could certainly be made.

Ugly sweaters, poor fashion choices, and shitty cars with anime girls painted on the side?

Only causes death by second-hand embarrassment. Maybe not excessively scantily clad anime girls at a... kindergarten? but apart from that only emotions will be hurt.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

0 evidence for your bullshit. Perfume makes me feel sick. Call centerd ban perfumes for tbis reason. It is VERY comparable smoking. When I can smell peoples perfume as they drive past me, that is FAR worse than smoke.

Don't have negative health effects on most people, though you can be asked to leave from many health care institutions if using too strong scents. Not really comparable to smoking but the argument could certainly be made.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had a coworker once that I swear to god used to bathe in perfume. You could smell her 2 minutes before she crossed your path and 5 minutes afterwards.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Had someone similar at my office, I had to ask her to stop at least spraying herself on the row because it was giving me and another headaches.

She did oblige to her credit

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Smoking causes negative health effects for everyone - this is not the case for perfumes. As I said, the argument could certainly be made to ban strong perfumes, but it isn't the one I'm making. I definitely reject the case that Adm. Patrick made that public smoking should be allowed because strong perfumes are allowed.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 2 points 1 week ago

And smoking is already banned in buildings, within 15 feet of an entrance of buildings, on buses, in parks, etc.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nobody hates the smell of cigarettes like true ex smokers. It simultaniously turns our stomachs and reminds us we will never ever feel truly relaxed or happy ever again.

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

Smells like rancid cat piss to me now, but man did I love my American Spirits.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago

Oh, so THATS why...

[–] Mac@mander.xyz -2 points 1 week ago

You're right, we should disband all laws. Wouldn't want to step on the toes of people who like to rape and murder for their hobby.